BILL ANALYSIS |
H.B. 2810 |
By: Turner, Chris |
Business & Industry |
Committee Report (Unamended) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There are concerns that, under current regulations regarding unemployment compensation benefits, workers employed by large multinational companies such as automotive workers may lose benefit eligibility if they lose their job as a result of workers in the same company in another state going on strike. H.B. 2810 seeks to ensure that Texans are not penalized and denied benefits in these instances by removing a provision disqualifying an individual from eligibility for employment compensation on the basis of their unemployment being caused by a labor dispute at another place owned and operated by the same employing unit.
|
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
ANALYSIS
H.B. 2810 amends the Labor Code to remove a provision disqualifying an individual for unemployment benefits for a benefit period in which their total or partial unemployment is caused by a labor dispute at another place that: · is owned or operated by the same employing unit that owns or operates the premises where the individual is or was last employed; and · supplies material or services necessary to the continued and usual operation of those premises.
H.B. 2810 exempts from disqualification due to a labor dispute an individual who shows to the satisfaction of the Texas Workforce Commission that they have been locked out of their place of employment or have been placed on emergency leave without pay by their employer. The bill defines "locked out" as an employer's denial of entry to employees who have neither gone on strike nor notified the employer of a date on which they intend to go on strike. The bill establishes that, for purposes of the existing exemptions from disqualification for individuals who show that they are not financing the applicable labor dispute, the payment of regular union dues does not constitute financing the dispute.
|
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2021.
|