| |
| |
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
|
relating to a feasibility study on the colocation of federal and |
|
|
state motor vehicle inspection facilities at ports of entry. |
|
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
|
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: |
|
|
(1) "Department" means the Texas Department of |
|
|
Transportation. |
|
|
(2) "Institute" means the Texas A&M Transportation |
|
|
Institute. |
|
|
(3) "Port of entry" has the meaning assigned by |
|
|
Section 201.710, Transportation Code. |
|
|
SECTION 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY ON COLOCATED INSPECTION PORTS. |
|
|
(a) The institute, in consultation with the department and the |
|
|
Department of Public Safety, shall conduct a feasibility study on |
|
|
erecting and maintaining a colocated federal and state inspection |
|
|
facility at each port of entry in this state for the inspection of |
|
|
motor vehicles for compliance with federal and state commercial |
|
|
motor vehicle regulations. The study must include: |
|
|
(1) a summary of: |
|
|
(A) past efforts by the Department of Public |
|
|
Safety and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to |
|
|
maintain colocated federal and state inspection facilities at each |
|
|
port of entry; |
|
|
(B) any current efforts to colocate or separate |
|
|
federal and state inspection facilities at ports of entry in other |
|
|
states; |
|
|
(C) current priorities and expectations of the |
|
|
department and the Department of Public Safety regarding motor |
|
|
vehicle inspections at ports of entry; |
|
|
(D) the department's and Department of Public |
|
|
Safety's perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of |
|
|
colocated federal and state inspection facilities; and |
|
|
(E) the Federal Motor Carrier Safety |
|
|
Administration's perspective on the advantages and disadvantages |
|
|
of colocated federal and state inspection facilities, as solicited |
|
|
by the institute under Subsection (b) of this section; and |
|
|
(2) potential scenarios for the colocation of federal |
|
|
and state inspection facilities at each port of entry in this state |
|
|
and an analysis of each scenario's advantages and disadvantages. |
|
|
(b) In conducting the study under this section, the |
|
|
institute shall solicit the Federal Motor Carrier Safety |
|
|
Administration's perspective on the advantages and disadvantages |
|
|
of colocated federal and state inspection facilities. |
|
|
SECTION 3. REPORT. Before the study under Section 2 of this |
|
|
Act is completed, the institute shall contact the Federal Motor |
|
|
Carrier Safety Administration to arrange receipt of the report |
|
|
required by this section. Not later than December 1, 2022, the |
|
|
institute shall report the results of the study conducted under |
|
|
Section 2 of this Act and any recommendations to the Federal Motor |
|
|
Carrier Safety Administration in the manner and format requested by |
|
|
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. |
|
|
SECTION 4. EXPIRATION DATE. This Act expires January 1, |
|
|
2023. |
|
|
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act takes effect September |
|
|
1, 2021. |