|
|
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to transmission and distribution system resiliency |
|
planning by and cost recovery for electric utilities. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that: |
|
(1) extreme weather conditions, including high winds, |
|
lightning, flooding, and freezes, can cause extraordinary damage to |
|
electrical transmission and distribution facilities, resulting in |
|
power outages; |
|
(2) it is in the state's interest to promote the use of |
|
resiliency measures to enable electrical transmission and |
|
distribution infrastructure to withstand extreme weather |
|
conditions, including hardening electrical transmission and |
|
distribution facilities, undergrounding certain electrical |
|
distribution lines, lightning mitigation measures, flood |
|
mitigation measures, information technology, cybersecurity |
|
measures, physical security measures, vegetation management, and |
|
wildfire mitigation and response; |
|
(3) protecting electrical transmission and |
|
distribution infrastructure from extreme weather conditions can |
|
effectively reduce system restoration costs to and outage times for |
|
customers and improve system resiliency and overall service |
|
reliability for customers; |
|
(4) it is in the state's interest for each electric |
|
utility to seek to mitigate system restoration costs to and outage |
|
times for customers when developing plans to enhance electrical |
|
transmission and distribution infrastructure storm resiliency; and |
|
(5) all customers benefit from reduced system |
|
restoration costs. |
|
SECTION 2. Subchapter D, Chapter 38, Utilities Code, is |
|
amended by adding Section 38.078 to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 38.078. TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM |
|
RESILIENCY PLAN AND COST RECOVERY. (a) In this section, "plan" |
|
means a transmission and distribution system resiliency plan |
|
described by Subsection (b). |
|
(b) An electric utility may file, in a manner authorized by |
|
commission rule, a plan to enhance the resiliency of the utility's |
|
transmission and distribution system through at least one of the |
|
following methods: |
|
(1) hardening electrical transmission and |
|
distribution facilities; |
|
(2) modernizing electrical transmission and |
|
distribution facilities; |
|
(3) undergrounding certain electrical distribution |
|
lines; |
|
(4) lightning mitigation measures; |
|
(5) flood mitigation measures; |
|
(6) information technology; |
|
(7) cybersecurity measures; |
|
(8) physical security measures; |
|
(9) vegetation management; or |
|
(10) wildfire mitigation and response. |
|
(c) A plan must explain the systematic approach the electric |
|
utility will use to carry out the plan during at least a three-year |
|
period. |
|
(d) In determining whether to approve a plan filed under |
|
this section, the commission shall consider: |
|
(1) the extent to which the plan is expected to enhance |
|
system resiliency, including whether the plan prioritizes areas of |
|
lower performance; and |
|
(2) the estimated costs of implementing the measures |
|
proposed in the plan. |
|
(e) The commission shall issue an order to approve, modify, |
|
or deny a plan filed under Subsection (b) and any associated rider |
|
described by Subsection (i) not later than the 180th day after the |
|
plan is filed with the commission. The commission may approve a |
|
plan only if the commission determines that approving the plan is in |
|
the public interest. |
|
(f) For a plan approved by the commission, with or without |
|
modification, an electric utility may request a good cause |
|
exception on implementing all or some of the measures in the plan if |
|
operational needs, business needs, financial conditions, or supply |
|
chain or labor conditions dictate the exception. The commission's |
|
denial of a plan is not considered to be a finding of the prudence or |
|
imprudence of a measure or cost in the plan for the purposes of |
|
Chapter 36 or this chapter. |
|
(g) An electric utility for which the commission has |
|
approved a plan under this section may request that the commission |
|
review an updated plan submitted by the electric utility. The |
|
updated plan must comply with any applicable commission rules and |
|
take effect on a date that is not earlier than the third anniversary |
|
of the approval date of the utility's most recently approved plan. |
|
The commission shall review and approve, modify, or deny the |
|
updated plan in the manner provided by Subsections (d), (e), and |
|
(f). |
|
(h) An electric utility's implementation of a plan approved |
|
under this section may be reviewed for the purposes of Chapter 36 or |
|
this chapter. If the commission determines that the costs to |
|
implement an approved plan were imprudently incurred or otherwise |
|
unreasonable, those costs are subject to disallowance. |
|
(i) Notwithstanding any other law, an electric utility may |
|
file with a plan an application for a rider to recover the electric |
|
utility's distribution investment that is made to implement a plan |
|
and is used and useful to the electric utility in providing service |
|
to the public. The electric utility may file the application before |
|
the electric utility places into service the distribution |
|
investment to implement an approved plan. The commission may |
|
approve the rider application before the electric utility places |
|
into service the distribution investment to implement an approved |
|
plan. The commission may not approve a rider that would allow an |
|
electric utility to begin recovering the distribution investment |
|
before the utility begins to use the investment to provide service |
|
to the public. If the commission approves or modifies the plan, the |
|
commission shall determine the appropriate terms of the rider in |
|
the approval order. The commission shall adopt a procedure for |
|
reconciliation of an electric utility's distribution-related costs |
|
to implement an approved plan. |
|
(j) As part of a review described by Subsection (g), the |
|
commission shall reconcile the rider authorized under Subsection |
|
(i) to determine the electric utility's reasonably and prudently |
|
incurred plan costs. |
|
(k) If an electric utility that files a plan with the |
|
commission does not apply for a rider under Subsection (i), after |
|
commission review, the utility may defer all or a portion of the |
|
distribution-related costs relating to the implementation of the |
|
plan for future recovery as a regulatory asset, including |
|
depreciation expense and carrying costs at the utility's weighted |
|
average cost of capital established in the commission's final order |
|
in the utility's most recent base rate proceeding in a manner |
|
consistent with Chapter 36, and use commission authorized cost |
|
recovery alternatives under Sections 36.209 and 36.210 or another |
|
general rate proceeding. |
|
(l) Plan costs considered by the commission to be reasonable |
|
and prudent may include only incremental costs that are not already |
|
being recovered through the electric utility's base rates or any |
|
other rate rider and must be allocated to customer classes pursuant |
|
to the rate design most recently approved by the commission. |
|
SECTION 3. The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall |
|
adopt rules to implement Section 38.078, Utilities Code, as added |
|
by this Act, not later than the 180th day after the effective date |
|
of this Act. |
|
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives |
|
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as |
|
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this |
|
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this |
|
Act takes effect September 1, 2023. |
|
|
|
______________________________ |
______________________________ |
|
President of the Senate |
Speaker of the House |
|
|
|
I certify that H.B. No. 2555 was passed by the House on April |
|
28, 2023, by the following vote: Yeas 147, Nays 0, 1 present, not |
|
voting; and that the House concurred in Senate amendments to H.B. |
|
No. 2555 on May 25, 2023, by the following vote: Yeas 134, Nays 7, |
|
2 present, not voting. |
|
|
|
______________________________ |
|
Chief Clerk of the House |
|
|
I certify that H.B. No. 2555 was passed by the Senate, with |
|
amendments, on May 17, 2023, by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays |
|
2. |
|
|
|
______________________________ |
|
Secretary of the Senate |
|
APPROVED: __________________ |
|
Date |
|
|
|
__________________ |
|
Governor |