1-1  By:  D. Smith or Harris (Senate Sponsor - Henderson)   H.B. No. 301
    1-2        (In the Senate - Received from the House April 26, 1993;
    1-3  April 27, 1993, read first time and referred to Committee on
    1-4  Jurisprudence; May 18, 1993, reported adversely, with favorable
    1-5  Committee Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 5, Nays 0;
    1-6  May 18, 1993, sent to printer.)
    1-7                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-8                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-9        Henderson          x                               
   1-10        Harris of Tarrant  x                               
   1-11        Brown              x                               
   1-12        Harris of Dallas                              x    
   1-13        Luna               x                               
   1-14        Parker                                        x    
   1-15        West               x                               
   1-16  COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR H.B. No. 301                By:  Henderson
   1-17                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-18                                AN ACT
   1-19  relating to judicial review of certain ad valorem tax
   1-20  determinations.
   1-21        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-22        SECTION 1.  Section 42.22, Tax Code, is amended to read as
   1-23  follows:
   1-24        Sec. 42.22.  VENUE.  (a)  Except as provided by Subsections
   1-25  (b) and (c), and by Section 42.221, venue <Venue> is in the county
   1-26  in which the appraisal review board that issued the order appealed
   1-27  is located.
   1-28        (b)  Venue of an action brought under Section 42.01(1) is in
   1-29  the county in which the property is located or in the county in
   1-30  which the appraisal review board that issued the order is located.
   1-31        (c)  Venue is in Travis County if the order appealed was
   1-32  issued by the comptroller.
   1-33        SECTION 2.  Subchapter B, Chapter 42, Tax Code, is amended by
   1-34  adding Section 42.221 to read as follows:
   1-35        Sec. 42.221.  CONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR MULTICOUNTY PIPELINE.
   1-36  (a)  The owner of an oil or gas pipeline that runs through more
   1-37  than one county and is appraised by more than one appraisal
   1-38  district may appeal an order of an appraisal review board relating
   1-39  to the pipeline, to property attached to or connected with the
   1-40  pipeline, or to an easement or other real property on which the
   1-41  pipeline is located to the district court of any county in which a
   1-42  portion of the pipeline is located if the order relating to that
   1-43  portion of the pipeline is appealed.
   1-44        (b)  A petition for review of each appraisal review board
   1-45  order under this section must be filed with the court as provided
   1-46  by Section 42.21.  The fee for filing each additional petition for
   1-47  review relating to a pipeline after the first petition for review
   1-48  relating to the same pipeline is filed for a tax year is $5.
   1-49        (c)  If only one appeal by the owner of an oil or gas
   1-50  pipeline is pending before the court in an appeal from the decision
   1-51  of an appraisal review board of a district other than the appraisal
   1-52  district for that county, any party to the suit may, not earlier
   1-53  than the 30th day before and not later than the 10th day before the
   1-54  date set for the hearing, make a motion to transfer the suit to a
   1-55  district court of the county in which the appraisal review board
   1-56  from which the appeal is taken is located.  In the absence of a
   1-57  showing that further appeals under this section will be filed, the
   1-58  court shall transfer the suit.
   1-59        (d)  When the owner files the first petition for review under
   1-60  this section for a pipeline for a tax year, the owner shall include
   1-61  with the petition a list of each appraisal district in which the
   1-62  pipeline is appraised for taxation in that tax year.
   1-63        (e)  The court shall consolidate all the appeals for a tax
   1-64  year relating to a single pipeline for which a petition for review
   1-65  is filed with the court and may consolidate other appeals relating
   1-66  to other pipelines of the same owner if the pipelines are located
   1-67  in one or more of the counties on the list required by Subsection
   1-68  (d).  Except as provided by this subsection, on the motion of the
    2-1  pipeline owner the court shall grant a continuance to provide the
    2-2  owner with an opportunity to include in the proceeding appeals of
    2-3  appraisal review board orders from additional appraisal districts.
    2-4  The court may not grant a continuance to include an appeal of an
    2-5  appraisal review board order that relates to the pipeline in that
    2-6  tax year after the time for filing a petition for review of that
    2-7  order has expired.
    2-8        (f)  This section does not affect the property owner's right
    2-9  to file a petition for review of an individual appraisal district's
   2-10  order relating to a pipeline in the district court in the county in
   2-11  which the appraisal review board is located.
   2-12        (g)  On a joint motion or the separate motions of at least 60
   2-13  percent of the appraisal districts that are defendants in a
   2-14  consolidated suit filed before the 45th day after the date on which
   2-15  the property owner's petitions for review of the appraisal review
   2-16  board orders relating to a pipeline for that tax year must be
   2-17  filed, the court shall transfer the suit to a district court of the
   2-18  county named in the motion or motions if that county is one in
   2-19  which one of the appraisal review boards from which an appeal was
   2-20  taken is located.
   2-21        SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 1993.  The
   2-22  changes in law made by this Act apply to any petition for review
   2-23  filed under Chapter 42, Tax Code, as amended by this Act, on or
   2-24  after the effective date of this Act and to any petition for review
   2-25  filed under that chapter that is pending before a district court on
   2-26  that date.
   2-27        SECTION 4.  The importance of this legislation and the
   2-28  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   2-29  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   2-30  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   2-31  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.
   2-32                               * * * * *
   2-33                                                         Austin,
   2-34  Texas
   2-35                                                         May 18, 1993
   2-36  Hon. Bob Bullock
   2-37  President of the Senate
   2-38  Sir:
   2-39  We, your Committee on Jurisprudence to which was referred H.B. No.
   2-40  301, have had the same under consideration, and I am instructed to
   2-41  report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that it do not
   2-42  pass, but that the Committee Substitute adopted in lieu thereof do
   2-43  pass and be printed.
   2-44                                                         Henderson,
   2-45  Chairman
   2-46                               * * * * *
   2-47                               WITNESSES
   2-48                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   2-49  ___________________________________________________________________
   2-50  Name:  Frank Powell                              x
   2-51  Representing:  Tx Ass'n Property Tax Profess.
   2-52  City:  Austin
   2-53  -------------------------------------------------------------------