By:  Culberson                                         H.B. No. 529
       73R2773 DLF-F
                                 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
    1-1                                AN ACT
    1-2  relating to proof of a health care liability claim.
    1-3        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
    1-4        SECTION 1.  Section 1.03(a)(3), Medical Liability and
    1-5  Insurance Improvement Act of Texas (Article 4590i, Vernon's Texas
    1-6  Civil Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
    1-7              (3)  "Health care provider" means any person,
    1-8  partnership, professional association, corporation, facility, or
    1-9  institution duly licensed or chartered by the State of Texas to
   1-10  provide health care as a registered nurse, hospital, dentist,
   1-11  podiatrist, pharmacist, or nursing home, or an officer, employee,
   1-12  or agent thereof acting in the course and scope of his employment,
   1-13  except that this subdivision does not apply to Subchapter G of this
   1-14  Act.
   1-15        SECTION 2.  Subchapter G, Medical Liability and Insurance
   1-16  Improvement Act of Texas (Article 4590i, Vernon's Texas Civil
   1-17  Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
   1-18               SUBCHAPTER G.  PROOF <RES IPSA LOQUITUR>
   1-19        Sec. 7.01.  DEFINITION.  In this subchapter, "health care
   1-20  provider" means any person, including a partnership, professional
   1-21  association, corporation, facility, or institution licensed,
   1-22  certified, registered, or chartered by this state to provide health
   1-23  care as a registered nurse, licensed vocational nurse, emergency
   1-24  medical services personnel or provider, hospital, dentist,
    2-1  podiatrist, pharmacist, chiropractor, physical therapist, or
    2-2  nursing home, or an officer, employee, or agent of those persons,
    2-3  acting in the course and scope of duties, employment, or agency.
    2-4        Sec. 7.02.  APPLICATION OF RES IPSA LOQUITUR.  The common-law
    2-5  doctrine of res ipsa loquitur shall only apply to health care
    2-6  liability claims against health care providers or physicians in
    2-7  those cases to which it has been applied by the appellate courts of
    2-8  this state as of August 29, 1977 <the effective date of this
    2-9  subchapter>.
   2-10        Sec. 7.03 <7.02>.  JURY INSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IN CERTAIN
   2-11  CASES.  (a)  In a jury trial involving a health care liability
   2-12  claim against a physician or hospital for injury to or death of a
   2-13  patient in which the court determines that the following
   2-14  instruction is reasonably applicable to the facts, the court shall
   2-15  provide the following instruction in the court's charge to the
   2-16  jury:
   2-17        "A finding of negligence may not be based solely on
   2-18        evidence of a bad result to the patient in question,
   2-19        but such a bad result may be considered by you, along
   2-20        with other evidence, in determining the issue of
   2-21        negligence; you shall be the sole judges of the weight,
   2-22        if any, to be given to any such evidence."
   2-23        (b)  Nothing in Subsection (a) of this section shall affect
   2-24  the existing law regarding the applicability or nonapplicability of
   2-25  the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to a health care liability claim.
   2-26        (c)  The determination of whether the instruction authorized
   2-27  by Subsection (a) of this section is reasonably applicable to the
    3-1  facts shall be made by the trial court in its sole discretion, and
    3-2  such determination by the trial court shall be reviewable by an
    3-3  appellate court only for an abuse of such discretion.
    3-4        Sec. 7.04.  STANDARD OF PROOF IN CERTAIN CASES.  In a suit
    3-5  involving a health care liability claim against a physician or
    3-6  health care provider for injury to or death of a patient, the
    3-7  claimant may prove that the treatment or lack of treatment by the
    3-8  physician or health care provider departed from accepted standard
    3-9  of medical care or health care only if the claimant shows by clear
   3-10  and convincing evidence that the physician or health care provider
   3-11  did not use the degree of care and skill that:
   3-12              (1)  may reasonably be expected of a prudent, competent
   3-13  physician or health care provider in the same or similar
   3-14  circumstances; and
   3-15              (2)  is commensurate with the care and skill of other
   3-16  physicians or health care providers of similar training,
   3-17  experience, or certification.
   3-18        Sec. 7.05.  CONFLICT WITH TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL EVIDENCE.  (a)
   3-19  To the extent that this subchapter conflicts with the Texas Rules
   3-20  of Civil Evidence, this subchapter controls.
   3-21        (b)  Notwithstanding Section 22.004, Government Code, the
   3-22  supreme court may not amend or adopt rules in conflict with this
   3-23  subchapter.
   3-24        SECTION 3.  (a)  Except as provided by Subsection (b) of this
   3-25  section, this Act takes effect September 1, 1993.
   3-26        (b)  This Act takes effect only if Subchapter G, Medical
   3-27  Liability and Insurance Improvement Act of Texas (Article 4590i,
    4-1  Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), is in effect on the effective date
    4-2  of this Act.  If, on the effective date of this Act, Subchapter G,
    4-3  Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act of Texas (Article
    4-4  4590i, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), has expired, this Act has no
    4-5  force or effect.
    4-6        (c)  This Act applies only to a suit that is filed on or
    4-7  after the effective date of this Act.  A suit that is filed before
    4-8  the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect at
    4-9  the time the suit is filed, and that law is continued in effect for
   4-10  that purpose.
   4-11        SECTION 4.  The importance of this legislation and the
   4-12  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   4-13  emergency   and   an   imperative   public   necessity   that   the
   4-14  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   4-15  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.