1-1  By:  Finnell (Senate Sponsor - Moncrief)              H.B. No. 1657
    1-2        (In the Senate - Received from the House May 3, 1993;
    1-3  May 4, 1993, read first time and referred to Committee on State
    1-4  Affairs; May 20, 1993, reported favorably, as amended, by the
    1-5  following vote:  Yeas 11, Nays 0; May 20, 1993, sent to printer.)
    1-6                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-7                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-8        Harris of Dallas   x                               
    1-9        Rosson             x                               
   1-10        Carriker           x                               
   1-11        Henderson                                     x    
   1-12        Leedom             x                               
   1-13        Lucio              x                               
   1-14        Luna                                          x    
   1-15        Nelson             x                               
   1-16        Patterson          x                               
   1-17        Shelley            x                               
   1-18        Sibley             x                               
   1-19        West               x                               
   1-20        Whitmire           x                               
   1-21  COMMITTEE AMENDMENT NO. 1                               By:  Rosson
   1-22  Amend C.S.H.B. No. 1657 as follows:
   1-23        (1)  In SECTION 2, strike lines 62 to 64 on page 1 and lines
   1-24  1 to 18 on page 2 and substitute the following:
   1-25        (a)  A person may not dismantle a warning signal at a grade
   1-26  crossing on an active rail line, as defined by the department by
   1-27  rule, if the cost of the warning signal was originally paid either
   1-28  entirely or partly from public funds unless the person:
   1-29              (1)  obtains a permit from the governmental entity that
   1-30  maintains the road or highway that intersects the rail line at the
   1-31  grade crossing; and
   1-32              (2)  pays to the governmental entity that maintains the
   1-33  road or highway that intersects the rail line at the grade crossing
   1-34  an amount equal to the present salvage value of the warning signal,
   1-35  as determined by the governmental entity under applicable law.
   1-36        (b)  The governmental entity shall grant the permit if:
   1-37              (1)  proper payment is received; and
   1-38              (2)  the entity finds that removal of the warning
   1-39  signal will not adversely affect public safety.
   1-40        (2)  Add new SECTION 3 to read as follows:
   1-41        SECTION 3.  A person who violates any provision of this Act
   1-42  commits an offense.  An offense under this Act is a Class C
   1-43  misdemeanor.
   1-44        (3)  Renumber subsequent Sections accordingly.
   1-45                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-46                                AN ACT
   1-47  relating to the dismantling of a warning signal at a railroad
   1-48  crossing.
   1-49        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-50        SECTION 1.  DEFINITIONS.  In this Act:
   1-51              (1)  "Department" means the Texas Department of
   1-52  Transportation.
   1-53              (2)  "Grade crossing" has the meaning assigned by
   1-54  Section 1, Chapter 269, Acts of the 71st Legislature, Regular
   1-55  Session, 1989 (Article 6370b, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
   1-56              (3)  "Warning signal" means a traffic control device
   1-57  that is activated by the approach or presence of a train, including
   1-58  a flashing light signal, an automatic gate, or a similar device
   1-59  that displays to motorists a warning of the approach or presence of
   1-60  a train.
   1-61        SECTION 2.  DISMANTLING OF WARNING SIGNAL AT GRADE CROSSING.
   1-62  (a)  A person may not dismantle a warning signal at a grade
   1-63  crossing on an active rail line, as defined by the department by
   1-64  rule, if the cost of the warning signal was originally paid either
   1-65  entirely or partly from public funds unless the person:
   1-66              (1)  obtains a permit from the governmental entity that
   1-67  maintains the road or highway that intersects the rail line at the
   1-68  grade crossing; or
    2-1              (2)  pays to the governmental entity that maintains the
    2-2  road or highway that intersects the rail line at the grade crossing
    2-3  an amount equal to the present salvage value of the warning signal.
    2-4        (b)  The governmental entity shall grant the permit if the
    2-5  entity finds that removal of the warning signal will not adversely
    2-6  affect public safety.
    2-7        (c)  The amounts received under Subsection (a)(2) of this
    2-8  section shall be deposited in a special fund in the state treasury
    2-9  to be known as the railroad crossing warning signal fund, which may
   2-10  be appropriated only to the department for the maintenance and
   2-11  improvement of warning signals at grade crossings.
   2-12        (d)  The provisions of this Act shall not apply to Class I or
   2-13  Class II railroads as defined by Interstate Commerce Commission
   2-14  rules and regulations.
   2-15        SECTION 3.  RULES.  The department may adopt any rules
   2-16  necessary to administer this Act.
   2-17        SECTION 4.  EFFECTIVE DATE.  This Act takes effect September
   2-18  1, 1993.
   2-19        SECTION 5.  EMERGENCY.  The importance of this legislation
   2-20  and the crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   2-21  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   2-22  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   2-23  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.
   2-24                               * * * * *
   2-25                                                         Austin,
   2-26  Texas
   2-27                                                         May 20, 1993
   2-28  Hon. Bob Bullock
   2-29  President of the Senate
   2-30  Sir:
   2-31  We, your Committee on State Affairs to which was referred H.B. No.
   2-32  1657, have had the same under consideration, and I am instructed to
   2-33  report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that it do
   2-34  pass, as amended, and be printed.
   2-35                                                         Harris of
   2-36  Dallas, Chairman
   2-37                               * * * * *
   2-38                               WITNESSES
   2-39                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   2-40  ___________________________________________________________________
   2-41  Name:  Sam Arrington                             x
   2-42  Representing:  United Transportation Union
   2-43  City:  Austin
   2-44  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-45  Name:  Jim Atchley                               x
   2-46  Representing:  United Transportation Union
   2-47  City:  Austin
   2-48  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-49  Name:  Wesley G. Pair                                          x
   2-50  Representing:  Tx Dept of Transportation
   2-51  City:  Austin
   2-52  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-53  Name:  Dennis Kearns                             x
   2-54  Representing:  Atchisnon Topeka & Santa Fe
   2-55  City:  Austin
   2-56  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-57  Name:  John L. Eck                               x
   2-58  Representing:  Texas Railroad Assn
   2-59  City:  Austin
   2-60  -------------------------------------------------------------------