H.R. No. 477 R E S O L U T I O N 1-1 WHEREAS, The United States District Court for the Western 1-2 District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the 1-3 5th Circuit, on January 27, 1993, in the case of LULAC, Council No. 1-4 4434, v. Clements, have held that the state's current method of 1-5 electing district court judges, as applied in several counties, 1-6 violates Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act; and 1-7 WHEREAS, The policy of the State of Texas expressed in its 1-8 constitution and laws is that election of district court judges be 1-9 by partisan, popular election; and 1-10 WHEREAS, It is necessary that the policies of the state be 1-11 consistent with requirements of federal law, and it also is 1-12 desirable that the legislature express its preference for 1-13 resolution of the pending litigation; now, therefore, be it 1-14 RESOLVED, That the at-large election system for the state 1-15 district courts in the nine affected counties will be replaced by a 1-16 phased-in plan in which each affected county will be divided into 1-17 electoral subdistricts. Each county will be designated a District 1-18 Number and each election unit--State Representative District, 1-19 Justice of the Peace Precinct, or County Commissioner 1-20 Precinct--shall be designated a Subdistrict Place Number. The plan 1-21 entails electoral subdistricts which are smaller than a county, 1-22 except for those district courts not changed by the Appendix 1-23 attached to this resolution. The plan uses existing State 2-1 Representative District, Justice of the Peace Precinct, or County 2-2 Commissioner Precinct lines. All election subdistricts used in 2-3 this plan are based on geographic boundaries as they existed on 2-4 January 1, 1993; and, be it further 2-5 RESOLVED, That, except for those courts not expressly covered 2-6 by this resolution and the attached Appendix, the State of Texas 2-7 agrees to eliminate the existing at-large system of electing 2-8 district judges in Dallas, Harris, Bexar, Tarrant, Travis, 2-9 Jefferson, Midland, Ector, and Lubbock counties, in the manner 2-10 detailed in the attached Appendix. In Harris, Dallas, Bexar, and 2-11 Jefferson counties, state district judges will be elected from 2-12 subdistricts comprised of Texas House of Representatives Districts; 2-13 in Tarrant and Travis counties, state district judges will be 2-14 elected from subdistricts comprised of Justice of the Peace 2-15 Precincts; and in Lubbock, Midland, and Ector counties, state 2-16 district judges will be elected from subdistricts comprised of 2-17 County Commissioner Precincts. The electoral scheme for some 2-18 district courts, including those courts currently occupied by 2-19 Defendant-Intervenor F. Harold Entz (the 194th District Court in 2-20 Dallas County) and by Defendant-Intervenor Sharolyn Wood (the 127th 2-21 District Court in Harris County), are not affected by this plan and 2-22 continue to be elected at-large; and, be it further 2-23 RESOLVED, That each electoral subdistrict will elect one or 2-24 more district judges as set out in the attached Appendix. Only 2-25 those voters residing within their respective electoral subdistrict 3-1 will be allowed to vote for their respective district judges; and, 3-2 be it further 3-3 RESOLVED, That for the party primaries: elections shall be 3-4 by place and by majority vote; if no candidate receives a majority 3-5 of votes cast, then the position will be filled by a runoff 3-6 election between the two candidates receiving the highest number of 3-7 votes cast for that position, all as provided by existing state 3-8 law. For the general elections, election shall be by plurality 3-9 vote, as provided by existing state law; and, be it further 3-10 RESOLVED, That, consistent with the Texas Constitution, all 3-11 candidates must reside in the county, but not necessarily the 3-12 electoral subdistrict from which they seek election. All district 3-13 judges must reside in the county from which they were elected for 3-14 the entirety of their term. If any district judge no longer 3-15 resides in his/her county, a vacancy shall be declared, and the 3-16 post filled in accordance with state law; and, be it further 3-17 RESOLVED, That the electoral subdistricts created under the 3-18 attached Appendix are for the purpose of election of state district 3-19 judges only. No change in jurisdiction or venue rules is made. 3-20 Consistent with Article V of the Texas Constitution, the attached 3-21 Appendix will not disturb the existing district lines of the 3-22 present judicial districts, except to the extent that it creates 3-23 electoral subdistricts within the aforementioned counties for the 3-24 purposes of electing district judges only; and, be it further 3-25 RESOLVED, That in the interim before all state district 4-1 judges in the affected counties are elected under this new 4-2 subdistricting plan, state district judges now in office shall 4-3 continue to hold their elective position until the expiration of 4-4 their respective terms; and, be it further 4-5 RESOLVED, That in the interim before all state district 4-6 judges in the affected counties are elected under this new 4-7 subdistricting plan, state district judges elected to a court for 4-8 which a subject-matter preference is statutorily provided, shall 4-9 continue to hear cases in accordance with that preference until the 4-10 expiration of their respective terms; and, be it further 4-11 RESOLVED, That there shall be no right of recusal of judges, 4-12 based solely upon their election under this plan; and, be it 4-13 further 4-14 RESOLVED, That an official copy of this resolution be 4-15 forwarded to the attorney general of Texas as an official 4-16 expression of the sentiment of the House of Representatives of the 4-17 State of Texas. 4-18 Cuellar of Webb 4-19 Edwards 4-20 Rangel 4-21 Thompson of Harris 4-22 Cuellar of Webb 4-23 Edwards 4-24 Rangel