1-1  By:  Turner, et al.                                     S.B. No. 76
    1-2        (In the Senate - Filed February 10, 1993; February 11, 1993,
    1-3  read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs;
    1-4  February 17, 1993, reported favorably, as amended, by the following
    1-5  vote:  Yeas 11, Nays 0; February 17, 1993, sent to printer.)
    1-6                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-7                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-8        Harris of Dallas   x                               
    1-9        Rosson             x                               
   1-10        Carriker           x                               
   1-11        Henderson                                      x   
   1-12        Leedom             x                               
   1-13        Lucio              x                               
   1-14        Luna               x                               
   1-15        Nelson             x                               
   1-16        Patterson                                      x   
   1-17        Shelley            x                               
   1-18        Sibley             x                               
   1-19        West               x                               
   1-20        Whitmire           x                               
   1-21  COMMITTEE AMENDMENT NO. 1                               By:  Rosson
   1-22  Amend SECTION 1 of S.B. No. 76 as follows:
   1-23        (1)  Delete Subdivision (6) in its entirety and substitute
   1-24  the following:
   1-25              (6)  denies a motion for summary judgment that is based
   1-26  in whole or in part upon a claim against or defense by a member of
   1-27  the electronic or print media arising under the free speech or free
   1-28  press clause of the First Amendment to the United States
   1-29  Constitution, or Article 1, Section 8, of the Texas Constitution,
   1-30  or Chapter 73, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
   1-31        (2)  Add a new Section 51.015 to read as follows:
   1-32        Sec. 51.015.  COSTS OF APPEAL.  In the case of an appeal
   1-33  brought pursuant to Section 51.014(6), each party shall be liable
   1-34  for and taxed its own costs of the appeal.
   1-35                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-36                                AN ACT
   1-37  relating to appeals of certain interlocutory orders and judgments
   1-38  upholding those orders.
   1-39        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-40        SECTION 1.  Section 51.014, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,
   1-41  is amended to read as follows:
   1-42        Sec. 51.014.  Appeal From Interlocutory Order.  A person may
   1-43  appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court, county
   1-44  court at law, or county court that:
   1-45              (1)  appoints a receiver or trustee;
   1-46              (2)  overrules a motion to vacate an order that
   1-47  appoints a receiver or trustee;
   1-48              (3)  certifies or refuses to certify a class in a suit
   1-49  brought under Rule 42 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure;
   1-50              (4)  grants or refuses a temporary injunction or grants
   1-51  or overrules a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction as
   1-52  provided by Chapter 65; <or>
   1-53              (5)  denies a motion for summary judgment that is based
   1-54  on an assertion of immunity by an individual who is an officer or
   1-55  employee of the state or a political subdivision of the state; or
   1-56              (6)  denies a motion for summary judgment that is based
   1-57  on a claim or a defense to a claim for defamation, libel, or
   1-58  slander or a claim or a defense to a claim arising from a broadcast
   1-59  or written publication.
   1-60        SECTION 2.  Section 22.225, Government Code, is amended by
   1-61  amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (d) to read as
   1-62  follows:
   1-63        (b)  Except as provided by Subsection (c) or (d), a judgment
   1-64  of a court of appeals is conclusive on the law and facts, and a
   1-65  writ of error is not allowed from the supreme court, in the
   1-66  following civil cases:
   1-67              (1)  a case appealed from a county court or from a
   1-68  district court when, under the constitution, a county court would
    2-1  have had original or appellate jurisdiction of the case, with the
    2-2  exception of a probate matter or a case involving state revenue
    2-3  laws or the validity or construction of a statute;
    2-4              (2)  <a case of slander;>
    2-5              <(3)>  a case of a contested election other than a
    2-6  contested election for a state officer, with the exception of a
    2-7  case where the validity of a statute is questioned by the decision;
    2-8              (3) <(4)>  an appeal from an interlocutory order
    2-9  appointing a receiver or trustee or from other interlocutory
   2-10  appeals that are allowed by law;
   2-11              (4) <(5)>  an appeal from an order or judgment in a
   2-12  suit in which a temporary injunction has been granted or refused or
   2-13  when a motion to dissolve has been granted or overruled; and
   2-14              (5) <(6)>  all other cases except the cases where
   2-15  appellate jurisdiction is given to the supreme court and is not
   2-16  made final in the courts of appeals.
   2-17        (d)  A writ of error is allowed from the supreme court for an
   2-18  appeal from an interlocutory order described by Section 51.014(6),
   2-19  Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
   2-20        SECTION 3.  (a)  This Act takes effect September 1, 1993.
   2-21        (b)  This Act applies only to the appeal of an interlocutory
   2-22  order from a court if the order was rendered on or after the
   2-23  effective date of this Act.  An interlocutory order rendered before
   2-24  the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect at
   2-25  the time the order was rendered, and that law is continued in
   2-26  effect for that purpose.
   2-27        SECTION 4.  The importance of this legislation and the
   2-28  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   2-29  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   2-30  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   2-31  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.
   2-32                               * * * * *
   2-33                                                         Austin,
   2-34  Texas
   2-35                                                         February 17,
   2-36  1993
   2-37  Hon. Bob Bullock
   2-38  President of the Senate
   2-39  Sir:
   2-40  We, your Committee on State Affairs to which was referred S.B. No.
   2-41  76, have had the same under consideration, and I am instructed to
   2-42  report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that it do
   2-43  pass, as amended, and be printed.
   2-44                                                         Harris of
   2-45  Dallas, Chairman
   2-46                               * * * * *
   2-47                               WITNESSES
   2-48                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   2-49  ___________________________________________________________________
   2-50  Name:  Robert Decherd                            x
   2-51  Representing:  Belo Corporation
   2-52  City:  Dallas
   2-53  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-54  Name:  Kirtie M. Kinser                          x
   2-55  Representing:  Appellate Fairness Coalition
   2-56  City:  Dallas
   2-57  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-58                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   2-59  ___________________________________________________________________
   2-60  Name:  Mark Yudof                                x
   2-61  Representing:  Appellate Fairness Coalition
   2-62  City:  Dallas
   2-63  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-64  Name:  Ken Long                                  x
   2-65  Representing:  The Round Rock Leader
   2-66  City:  Round Rock
   2-67  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-68  Name:  Lyndell Williams                          x
   2-69  Representing:  Texas Press Association
   2-70  City:  Austin
    3-1  -------------------------------------------------------------------
    3-2  Name:  Barbara Ehli Taute                        x
    3-3  Representing:  Texas Daily Newspaper Assn
    3-4  City:  Austin
    3-5  -------------------------------------------------------------------
    3-6  Name:  Ann Arnold                                x
    3-7  Representing:  Texas Assoc of Broadcasters
    3-8  City:  Austin
    3-9  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-10  Name:  Joe Jerkins                               x
   3-11  Representing:  Texas Assoc of Broadcasters
   3-12  City:  Austin
   3-13  -------------------------------------------------------------------