1-1  By:  Zaffirini                                         S.B. No. 482
    1-2        (In the Senate - Filed February 25, 1993; March 1, 1993, read
    1-3  first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice;
    1-4  April 6, 1993, reported adversely, with favorable Committee
    1-5  Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 6, Nays 0; April 6, 1993,
    1-6  sent to printer.)
    1-7                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-8                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-9        Whitmire                                      x    
   1-10        Brown              x                               
   1-11        Nelson             x                               
   1-12        Sibley             x                               
   1-13        Sims               x                               
   1-14        Turner             x                               
   1-15        West               x                               
   1-16  COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 482                     By:  West
   1-17                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-18                                AN ACT
   1-19  relating to a prohibition of the requirement of a polygraph
   1-20  examination of a complainant as a condition of charging a defendant
   1-21  accused of certain criminal offenses.
   1-22        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-23        SECTION 1.  Chapter 15, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
   1-24  amended by adding Article 15.051 to read as follows:
   1-25        Art. 15.051.  POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION OF COMPLAINANT
   1-26  PROHIBITED.  (a)  A peace officer or attorney representing the
   1-27  state may not require a polygraph examination of a person who
   1-28  charges or seeks to charge in a complaint the commission of an
   1-29  offense under Section 21.11, 22.011, 22.021, or 25.02, Penal Code.
   1-30        (b)  If a peace officer or attorney representing the state
   1-31  requests a polygraph examination of a person who charges or seeks
   1-32  to charge in a complaint the commission of an offense listed in
   1-33  Subsection (a) of this article, the peace officer or attorney must
   1-34  inform the complainant that the examination is not required and
   1-35  that a complaint may not be dismissed solely:
   1-36              (1)  because a complainant did not take a polygraph
   1-37  examination; or
   1-38              (2)  on the basis of the results of a polygraph
   1-39  examination taken by the complainant.
   1-40        (c)  A peace officer or attorney representing the state may
   1-41  not take a polygraph examination of a person who charges or seeks
   1-42  to charge the commission of an offense listed in Subsection (a) of
   1-43  this article unless the officer or attorney provides the
   1-44  information in Subsection (b) of this article to the person and the
   1-45  person signs a statement indicating the person understands the
   1-46  information.
   1-47        (d)  A complaint may not be dismissed solely:
   1-48              (1)  because a complainant did not take a polygraph
   1-49  examination; or
   1-50              (2)  on the basis of the results of a polygraph
   1-51  examination taken by the complainant.
   1-52        SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect September 1, 1993.
   1-53        SECTION 3.  The importance of this legislation and the
   1-54  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   1-55  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   1-56  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   1-57  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.
   1-58                               * * * * *
   1-59                                                         Austin,
   1-60  Texas
   1-61                                                         April 6, 1993
   1-62  Hon. Bob Bullock
   1-63  President of the Senate
   1-64  Sir:
   1-65  We, your Committee on Criminal Justice to which was referred S.B.
   1-66  No. 482, have had the same under consideration, and I am instructed
   1-67  to report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that it do
   1-68  not pass, but that the Committee Substitute adopted in lieu thereof
    2-1  do pass and be printed.
    2-2                                                         Whitmire,
    2-3  Chairman
    2-4                               * * * * *
    2-5                               WITNESSES
    2-6                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
    2-7  ___________________________________________________________________
    2-8  Name:  G. K. Sprinkle                            x
    2-9  Representing:  Tx Assoc Against Sex. Assault
   2-10  City:  Austin
   2-11  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-12  Name:  Lacey Sloan                               x
   2-13  Representing:  Tx Assoc Against Sex. Assault
   2-14  City:  Austin
   2-15  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-16  Name:  Bobby Jones                               x
   2-17  Representing:  Tx Assoc of Polygraph Examine
   2-18  City:  Dallas
   2-19  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-20  Name:  Bryan Perot                                             x
   2-21  Representing:  Polygraph Examiners Bd
   2-22  City:  Austin
   2-23  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-24  Name:  Nancy Tart                                x
   2-25  Representing:  TAASA
   2-26  City:  Austin
   2-27  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-28  Name:  Rebecca Allen                             x
   2-29  Representing:  SAAFE House
   2-30  City:  Huntsville
   2-31  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-32  Name:  Samantha McDiarmid                        x
   2-33  Representing:  Family Crisis Center
   2-34  City:  Harlingen
   2-35  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-36  Name:  Laura Gee                                 x
   2-37  Representing:  Victims
   2-38  City:  Beaumont
   2-39  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-40  Name:  Kimbra Ogg                                x
   2-41  Representing:  Harris County Dist Atty
   2-42  City:  Houston
   2-43  -------------------------------------------------------------------