1-1  By:  Henderson                                         S.B. No. 548
    1-2        (In the Senate - Filed March 2, 1993; March 2, 1993, read
    1-3  first time and referred to Committee on Jurisprudence;
    1-4  March 16, 1993, reported favorably, as amended, by the following
    1-5  vote:  Yeas 7, Nays 0; March 16, 1993, sent to printer.)
    1-6                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-7                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-8        Henderson          x                               
    1-9        Harris of Tarrant  x                               
   1-10        Brown              x                               
   1-11        Harris of Dallas   x                               
   1-12        Luna               x                               
   1-13        Parker             x                               
   1-14        West               x                               
   1-15  COMMITTEE AMENDMENT NO. 1                            By:  Henderson
   1-16  Amend S.B. No. 548 by:
   1-17        1.  Striking the colon on line 39 of Page 1;
   1-18        2.  Striking lines 40 through 42 of Page 1; and
   1-19        3.  Striking "(3)" on line 43 of Page 1.
   1-20                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-21                                AN ACT
   1-22  relating to judicial review of ad valorem tax appraisals of oil and
   1-23  gas pipelines.
   1-24        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-25        SECTION 1.  Section 42.22, Tax Code, is amended to read as
   1-26  follows:
   1-27        Sec. 42.22.  VENUE.  Venue is in the county in which the
   1-28  appraisal review board that issued the order appealed is located,
   1-29  except as provided by Section 42.221.  Venue is in Travis County if
   1-30  the order appealed was issued by the comptroller.
   1-31        SECTION 2.  Subchapter B, Chapter 42, Tax Code, is amended by
   1-32  adding Section 42.221 to read as follows:
   1-33        Sec. 42.221.  CONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR MULTICOUNTY PIPELINE.
   1-34  (a)  The owner of an oil or gas pipeline that runs through more
   1-35  than one county and is appraised by more than one appraisal
   1-36  district may appeal an order of an appraisal review board relating
   1-37  to the pipeline, to property attached to or used in connection with
   1-38  the pipeline, or to an easement or other real property on which the
   1-39  pipeline is located to the district court of:
   1-40              (1)  the county in which the owner resides;
   1-41              (2)  the county in which the principal place of
   1-42  business of the owner is located; or
   1-43              (3)  any county in which a portion of the pipeline is
   1-44  located.
   1-45        (b)  A petition for review of each appraisal review board
   1-46  order under this section must be filed with the court as provided
   1-47  by Section 42.21.  The fee for filing each additional petition for
   1-48  review relating to a pipeline after the first petition for review
   1-49  relating to the same pipeline is filed for a tax year is $5.
   1-50        (c)  If only one appeal by the owner of an oil or gas
   1-51  pipeline is pending before the court in an appeal from the decision
   1-52  of an appraisal review board of a district other than the appraisal
   1-53  district for that county, any party to the suit may, not earlier
   1-54  than the 30th day before and not later than the 10th day before the
   1-55  date set for the hearing, make a motion to transfer the suit to a
   1-56  district court of the county in which the appraisal review board
   1-57  from which the appeal is taken is located.  In the absence of a
   1-58  showing that further appeals under this section will be filed, the
   1-59  court shall transfer the suit.
   1-60        (d)  When the owner files the first petition for review under
   1-61  this section for a pipeline for a tax year, the owner shall include
   1-62  with the petition a list of each appraisal district in which the
   1-63  pipeline is appraised for taxation in that tax year.
   1-64        (e)  The court shall consolidate all the appeals for a tax
   1-65  year relating to a single pipeline for which a petition for review
   1-66  is filed with the court and may consolidate other appeals relating
   1-67  to other pipelines of the same owner if the court considers it
   1-68  appropriate to do so.  On the motion of the pipeline owner, the
    2-1  court shall grant a continuance to provide the owner with an
    2-2  opportunity to include in the proceeding appeals of appraisal
    2-3  review board orders from additional appraisal districts.
    2-4        (f)  This section does not affect the property owner's right
    2-5  to file a petition for review of an individual appraisal district's
    2-6  order relating to a pipeline in the district court in the county in
    2-7  which the appraisal review board is located.
    2-8        SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 1993.  The
    2-9  changes in law made by this Act apply to any petition for review
   2-10  filed under Chapter 42, Tax Code, as amended by this Act, on or
   2-11  after the effective date of this Act and to any petition for review
   2-12  filed under that chapter that is pending before a district court on
   2-13  that date.
   2-14        SECTION 4.  The importance of this legislation and the
   2-15  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   2-16  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   2-17  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   2-18  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.
   2-19                               * * * * *
   2-20                                                         Austin,
   2-21  Texas
   2-22                                                         March 16, 1993
   2-23  Hon. Bob Bullock
   2-24  President of the Senate
   2-25  Sir:
   2-26  We, your Committee on Jurisprudence to which was referred S.B. No.
   2-27  548, have had the same under consideration, and I am instructed to
   2-28  report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that it do
   2-29  pass, as amended, and be printed.
   2-30                                                         Henderson,
   2-31  Chairman
   2-32                               * * * * *
   2-33                               WITNESSES
   2-34                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   2-35  ___________________________________________________________________
   2-36  Name:  M. Frank Powell                           x
   2-37  Representing:  Coastal, Enron, El Paso,
   2-38      Valero
   2-39  City:  Austin
   2-40  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-41  Name:  John Eck                                  x
   2-42  Representing:  Frank Powell
   2-43  City:  Austin
   2-44  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-45  Name:  Robert R. Elliott                         x
   2-46  Representing:  El Paso Natural Gas
   2-47  City:  Austin
   2-48  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-49  Name:  J. Richard Davis                          x
   2-50  Representing:  Enron Corp.
   2-51  City:  Houston
   2-52  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-53  Name:  Ben Sebree                                x
   2-54  Representing:  Texas Mid-Continent Oil & Gas
   2-55  City:  Austin
   2-56  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-57  Name:  Roy G. Martin, Jr.                        x
   2-58  Representing:  Valero Energy
   2-59  City:  San Antonio
   2-60  -------------------------------------------------------------------