1-1  By:  Patterson                                         S.B. No. 711
    1-2        (In the Senate - Filed March 9, 1993; March 9, 1993, read
    1-3  first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice;
    1-4  May 11, 1993, reported adversely, with favorable Committee
    1-5  Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 6, Nays 0; May 11, 1993,
    1-6  sent to printer.)
    1-7                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-8                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-9        Whitmire           x                               
   1-10        Brown              x                               
   1-11        Nelson             x                               
   1-12        Sibley                                        x    
   1-13        Sims               x                               
   1-14        Turner             x                               
   1-15        West               x                               
   1-16  COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 711                     By:  Sims
   1-17                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-18                                AN ACT
   1-19  relating to prohibiting employment discrimination against certain
   1-20  peace officers and fire fighters for refusing to take a polygraph
   1-21  examination.
   1-22        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-23        SECTION 1.  (a)  A fire fighter or peace officer may not be
   1-24  required to submit to a polygraph examination as part of an
   1-25  internal investigation regarding the conduct of the fire fighter or
   1-26  peace officer unless:
   1-27              (1)  the complainant submits to a polygraph examination
   1-28  and no deception is indicated regarding matters critical to the
   1-29  subject matter under investigation or the results of the
   1-30  examination are inconclusive; or
   1-31              (2)  the fire fighter or peace officer is ordered to
   1-32  take an examination under Subsection (d) or (e) of this section.
   1-33        (b)  Subdivision (1) of Subsection (a) of this section does
   1-34  not apply if the complainant is mentally incapable of being
   1-35  polygraphed.
   1-36        (c)  The results of a polygraph examination that relate to
   1-37  the complaint or issue under investigation are admissible in a
   1-38  proceeding before a regulatory authority hearing the complaint
   1-39  only:
   1-40              (1)  to corroborate other statements or evidence; or
   1-41              (2)  with the consent of the officer subject to the
   1-42  process.
   1-43        (d)  A department head may order a fire fighter or peace
   1-44  officer to submit to a polygraph examination if the department head
   1-45  considers the circumstances to be extraordinary, the department
   1-46  head believes that the integrity of the fire fighter or peace
   1-47  officer is in question, and the department head submits to the fire
   1-48  fighter or peace officer being investigated a written explanation
   1-49  of the nature of the extraordinary circumstances.
   1-50        (e)  A fire fighter or peace officer may be required to
   1-51  submit to a polygraph examination if the complaint is confined to
   1-52  internal operations, the complainant is an employee of the
   1-53  department, and there is prima facie evidence that the complaint is
   1-54  valid.
   1-55        SECTION 2.  This Act does not apply to a peace officer:
   1-56              (1)  to whom Section 411.007, Government Code, and its
   1-57  subsequent amendments apply; or
   1-58              (2)  who has been ordered to take a polygraph
   1-59  examination under Section 143.124, Local Government Code, and its
   1-60  subsequent amendments.
   1-61        SECTION 3.  The importance of this legislation and the
   1-62  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   1-63  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   1-64  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   1-65  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended,
   1-66  and that this Act take effect and be in force from and after its
   1-67  passage, and it is so enacted.
   1-68                               * * * * *
    2-1                                                         Austin,
    2-2  Texas
    2-3                                                         May 11, 1993
    2-4  Hon. Bob Bullock
    2-5  President of the Senate
    2-6  Sir:
    2-7  We, your Committee on Criminal Justice to which was referred S.B.
    2-8  No. 711, have had the same under consideration, and I am instructed
    2-9  to report it back to the Senate with the recommendation that it do
   2-10  not pass, but that the Committee Substitute adopted in lieu thereof
   2-11  do pass and be printed.
   2-12                                                         Whitmire,
   2-13  Chairman
   2-14                               * * * * *
   2-15                               WITNESSES
   2-16                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   2-17  ___________________________________________________________________
   2-18  Name:  Mark Clark                                x
   2-19  Representing:  CLEAT
   2-20  City:  Austin
   2-21  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-22  Name:  Stephen E. Vitasun                        x
   2-23  Representing:  Plano Police Assoc.
   2-24  City:  Plano
   2-25  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   2-26  Name:  Jim Lyde                                  x
   2-27  Representing:  Texas Municipal Police Assoc
   2-28  City:  Austin
   2-29  -------------------------------------------------------------------