1-1  By:  Whitmire                                          S.B. No. 783
    1-2        (In the Senate - Filed March 10, 1993; March 11, 1993, read
    1-3  first time and referred to Committee on Intergovernmental
    1-4  Relations; April 29, 1993, reported adversely, with favorable
    1-5  Committee Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 6, Nays 1;
    1-6  April 29, 1993, sent to printer.)
    1-7                            COMMITTEE VOTE
    1-8                          Yea     Nay      PNV      Absent 
    1-9        Armbrister         x                               
   1-10        Leedom             x                               
   1-11        Carriker                                      x    
   1-12        Henderson          x                               
   1-13        Madla              x                               
   1-14        Moncrief                                      x    
   1-15        Patterson                                     x    
   1-16        Rosson             x                               
   1-17        Shapiro                    x                       
   1-18        Wentworth                                     x    
   1-19        Whitmire           x                               
   1-20  COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 783                 By:  Whitmire
   1-21                         A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
   1-22                                AN ACT
   1-23  relating to the investigation of a county or municipal law
   1-24  enforcement officer in certain counties and municipalities.
   1-25        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
   1-26        SECTION 1.  Chapter 180, Local Government Code, is amended by
   1-27  adding Section 180.004 to read as follows:
   1-28        Sec. 180.004.  INVESTIGATION OF COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL LAW
   1-29  ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN CERTAIN COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES.
   1-30  (a)  This section does not apply:
   1-31              (1)  in a municipality in which Section 143.123
   1-32  applies; or
   1-33              (2)  to an interrogation about an incident that could
   1-34  in reasonable probability result in criminal charges being filed
   1-35  against the law enforcement officer being interrogated.
   1-36        (b)  In this section:
   1-37              (1)  "Agency" means a county or municipal law
   1-38  enforcement agency.
   1-39              (2)  "Complainant" means a person claiming to be the
   1-40  victim of misconduct by a law enforcement officer.
   1-41              (3)  "Investigation" means an administrative
   1-42  investigation, conducted by the employing or appointing law
   1-43  enforcement agency, of alleged misconduct by a law enforcement
   1-44  officer that could in reasonable probability result in punitive
   1-45  action against that person.
   1-46              (4)  "Investigator" means an agent or employee of an
   1-47  agency who is assigned to conduct an investigation.
   1-48              (5)  "Law enforcement officer" means a person who is
   1-49  employed or appointed by a county or municipal law enforcement
   1-50  agency, or the agency head, and who is a peace officer under
   1-51  Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, or other law.
   1-52              (6)  "Normally assigned working hours" includes those
   1-53  hours during which a law enforcement officer is actually at work or
   1-54  at the person's assigned place of work but does not include any
   1-55  time when the person is off duty on authorized leave, including
   1-56  sick leave.
   1-57              (7)  "Punitive action" means a disciplinary suspension,
   1-58  dismissal from the agency, demotion in rank, or any combination of
   1-59  those actions.
   1-60        (c)  An investigator may interrogate a law enforcement
   1-61  officer who is the subject of an investigation only during the law
   1-62  enforcement officer's normally assigned working hours unless the
   1-63  law enforcement officer is compensated for the interrogation time
   1-64  on an overtime basis.
   1-65        (d)  The agency head may not consider work time missed from
   1-66  regular duties by a law enforcement officer due to participation in
   1-67  the conduct of an investigation in determining whether to impose a
   1-68  punitive action or in determining the severity of a punitive
    2-1  action.
    2-2        (e)  An investigator may not interrogate a law enforcement
    2-3  officer who is the subject of an investigation at that person's
    2-4  home without that person's permission.
    2-5        (f)  A law enforcement officer who is the subject of an
    2-6  investigation has the right to inquire and, on inquiry, to be
    2-7  informed of the identities of each investigator participating in an
    2-8  interrogation of the law enforcement officer.  In an agency with
    2-9  more than 75 law enforcement officers, a person may not be assigned
   2-10  to conduct an investigation if the person is the complainant, the
   2-11  ultimate decision maker regarding punitive  action, or a person who
   2-12  has any personal involvement regarding the alleged misconduct.
   2-13        (g)  Before an investigator may interrogate a law enforcement
   2-14  officer who is the subject of an investigation, the investigator
   2-15  must inform the law enforcement officer in writing of the nature of
   2-16  the investigation and the name of each person who complained about
   2-17  the law enforcement officer concerning the matters under
   2-18  investigation.  An investigator may not conduct an interrogation of
   2-19  a law enforcement officer based on a complaint by a complainant who
   2-20  is not a peace officer unless the complainant verifies the
   2-21  complaint in writing before a public officer who is authorized by
   2-22  law to take statements under oath.  In an investigation authorized
   2-23  under this subsection, an investigator may interrogate a law
   2-24  enforcement officer about events or conduct reported by a witness
   2-25  who is not a complainant without disclosing the name of the
   2-26  witness.  An interrogation may be based on a complaint from an
   2-27  anonymous complainant if the agency employee receiving the
   2-28  anonymous complaint certifies in writing, under oath, that the
   2-29  complaint was anonymous.  This subsection does not apply to an
   2-30  on-the-scene investigation that occurs immediately after an
   2-31  incident being investigated if the limitations of this subsection
   2-32  would unreasonably hinder the essential purpose of the
   2-33  investigation or interrogation.  If the limitation would hinder the
   2-34  investigation or interrogation, the law enforcement officer under
   2-35  investigation must be furnished, as soon as practicable, a written
   2-36  statement of the nature of the investigation, the name of each
   2-37  complaining party, and the complaint, affidavit, or statement.
   2-38        (h)  An interrogation session of a law enforcement officer
   2-39  who is the subject of an investigation may not be unreasonably
   2-40  long.  In determining reasonableness, the gravity and complexity of
   2-41  the investigation must be considered.  The investigators shall
   2-42  allow reasonable interruptions to permit the law enforcement
   2-43  officer to attend to personal physical necessities.
   2-44        (i)  An investigator may not threaten a law enforcement
   2-45  officer who is the subject of an investigation with punitive action
   2-46  during an interrogation.  However, an investigator may inform a law
   2-47  enforcement officer that failure to truthfully answer reasonable
   2-48  questions directly related to the investigation or to fully
   2-49  cooperate in the conduct of the investigation may result in
   2-50  punitive action.
   2-51        (j)  If prior notification of intent to record an
   2-52  interrogation is given to the other party, either the investigator
   2-53  or the law enforcement officer who is the subject of an
   2-54  interrogation may record the interrogation.
   2-55        (k)  If an investigation does not result in punitive action
   2-56  against a law enforcement officer but does result in a reprimand
   2-57  recorded in writing or an adverse finding or determination
   2-58  regarding that person, the reprimand, finding, or determination may
   2-59  not be placed in that person's personnel file unless the law
   2-60  enforcement officer is first given an opportunity to read and sign
   2-61  the document.  If the law enforcement officer refuses to sign the
   2-62  reprimand, finding, or determination, it may be placed in the
   2-63  personnel file with a notation that the person refused to sign it.
   2-64  A law enforcement officer may respond in writing to a reprimand,
   2-65  finding, or determination that is placed in the person's personnel
   2-66  file under this subsection by submitting a written response to the
   2-67  agency head within 10 days after the date the law enforcement
   2-68  officer is asked to sign the document.  The response shall be
   2-69  placed in the personnel file.  A law enforcement officer who
   2-70  receives a punitive action and who elects not to appeal the action
    3-1  under any available appeal procedure may file a written response as
    3-2  prescribed by this subsection within 10 days after the date the
    3-3  person is given written notice of the punitive action from the
    3-4  agency head.
    3-5        (l)  Any information obtained in violation of this section
    3-6  may not be used as evidence against the law enforcement officer in
    3-7  any administrative action.
    3-8        SECTION 2.  The importance of this legislation and the
    3-9  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   3-10  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   3-11  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   3-12  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended,
   3-13  and that this Act take effect and be in force from and after its
   3-14  passage, and it is so enacted.
   3-15                               * * * * *
   3-16                                                         Austin,
   3-17  Texas
   3-18                                                         April 29, 1993
   3-19  Hon. Bob Bullock
   3-20  President of the Senate
   3-21  Sir:
   3-22  We, your Committee on Intergovernmental Relations to which was
   3-23  referred S.B. No. 783, have had the same under consideration, and I
   3-24  am instructed to report it back to the Senate with the
   3-25  recommendation that it do not pass, but that the Committee
   3-26  Substitute adopted in lieu thereof do pass and be printed.
   3-27                                                         Armbrister,
   3-28  Chairman
   3-29                               * * * * *
   3-30                               WITNESSES
   3-31                                                  FOR   AGAINST  ON
   3-32  ___________________________________________________________________
   3-33  Name:  Michael Hoard                             x
   3-34  Representing:  Houston Police Patrolmen's
   3-35  City:  Houston
   3-36  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-37  Name:  Wade Raper                                x
   3-38  Representing:  TCOPS
   3-39  City:  Irving
   3-40  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-41  Name:  Thomas H. Kelly II                        x
   3-42  Representing:  TCOPS
   3-43  City:  Plano
   3-44  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-45  Name:  BJ Browning                               x
   3-46  Representing:  TX Conference of Police
   3-47  City:  Dallas
   3-48  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-49  Name:  Robert Diaz                                       x
   3-50  Representing:  City of Arlington
   3-51  City:  Arlington
   3-52  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-53  Name:  Lynwood Moreau                            x
   3-54  Representing:  Tx Conference of Police
   3-55  City:  Houston
   3-56  -------------------------------------------------------------------
   3-57  Name:  Jim Lyde                                  x
   3-58  Representing:  TX Munic. Police Assoc.
   3-59  City:  Austin
   3-60  -------------------------------------------------------------------