By:  Lucio                                            S.B. No. 1252
                                 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
                                        AN ACT
    1-1  relating to selection of doctors under the Texas Workers'
    1-2  Compensation Act.
    1-3        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
    1-4        SECTION 1.  Section 4.63, Texas Workers' Compensation Act
    1-5  (Article 8308-4.63, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), is amended to
    1-6  read as follows:
    1-7        Section 4.63.  Selection of doctor. (a)  <This section takes
    1-8  effect January 1, 1993.>
    1-9        <(b)>  Except in an emergency, the commission shall require
   1-10  the employee to receive medical treatment from a doctor chosen from
   1-11  a list of doctors approved by the commission.  The employee is
   1-12  entitled to the employee's initial choice of a doctor from the
   1-13  commission's list.
   1-14        (b) <(c)>  If the employee is dissatisfied with the
   1-15  employee's initial choice of doctor from the commission's list, the
   1-16  employee may change doctors once on submission to the commission in
   1-17  writing of the reasons for the employee's change in doctors.
   1-18  Thereafter, if the employee is dissatisfied with the employee's
   1-19  choice of doctor from the commission's list, the employee may
   1-20  notify the commission and request authority to select an alternate
   1-21  doctor.  The notification should be in writing stating the reasons
   1-22  for the change, except notification may be by telephone when a
   1-23  medical necessity exists for immediate change.
    2-1        (c) <(d)>  The commission will prescribe criteria by which
    2-2  the commission will grant the employee authority to select an
    2-3  alternate doctor.  As criteria, the commission may include but is
    2-4  not limited to:
    2-5              (1)  whether treatment by the current doctor is
    2-6  medically inappropriate;
    2-7              (2)  the professional reputation of the doctor;
    2-8              (3)  whether the employee is receiving appropriate
    2-9  medical care to reach maximum medical improvement; and
   2-10              (4)  whether a conflict exists or has developed between
   2-11  the employee and the doctor to the extent that the doctor-patient
   2-12  relationship is jeopardized or impaired.
   2-13        (d) <(e)>  Any change of doctor may not be made for the
   2-14  purpose of securing a new impairment rating or medical report.
   2-15        (e) <(f)>  For the purposes of this section, all doctors duly
   2-16  licensed in this state are included on the list at the time of the
   2-17  effective date of this section or on their licensure in this state.
   2-18  Doctors not licensed in this state but licensed in another state or
   2-19  jurisdiction who treat employees may apply with the commission for
   2-20  inclusion on the approved list.
   2-21        (f) <(g)>  The commission shall establish criteria for
   2-22  deleting a doctor from the approved list.  The criteria may include
   2-23  anything considered relevant by the commission and may include but
   2-24  are not limited to:
   2-25              (1)  sanctions of the doctor by the commission for
    3-1  violations of Article 10 of this Act;
    3-2              (2)  sanctions by the Medicare or Medicaid program
    3-3  which are based on substandard medical care, overcharging, or
    3-4  overutilization of medical services;
    3-5              (3)  evidence from the commission's medical records
    3-6  that the doctor's charges, fees, diagnoses, or treatments are
    3-7  substantially different from those the commission finds to be fair
    3-8  and reasonable; and
    3-9              (4)  suspension of a doctor's license by the
   3-10  appropriate licensing authority.
   3-11        (g) <(h)>  The commission shall establish procedures for
   3-12  application for reinstatement to the list.
   3-13        SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect September 1, 1993.
   3-14        SECTION 3.  The importance of this legislation and the
   3-15  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   3-16  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
   3-17  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
   3-18  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.