By:  Harris of Tarrant                          S.R. No. 1145
                                   SENATE RESOLUTION
    1-1        BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the State of Texas, That Rule
    1-2  12.03, Rules of the Senate, 73rd Legislature, is suspended, as
    1-3  provided by Senate Rule 12.08, to the extent described in this
    1-4  Resolution, to enable the conference committee appointed to adjust
    1-5  the differences between the House and Senate versions of H.B. 1630,
    1-6  relating to the rights, privileges, duties, and powers of
    1-7  conservators, to successfully conclude the committee's
    1-8  deliberations, by authorizing the conferees to consider and take
    1-9  action on the following specific matters:
   1-10        (1)  Senate Rule 12.03(1) is suspended to permit the
   1-11  committee to change Subsection (b), Section 14.02, Family Code, to
   1-12  read as follows:
   1-13        (b)  Unless by written findings the court determines it would
   1-14  not be in the best interest of the child <Except as provided in
   1-15  Subsection (d) of this section>, a parent appointed as a <sole
   1-16  managing> conservator of the child retains <all> the following
   1-17  rights, privileges, duties, and powers of a parent <to the
   1-18  exclusion of the other parent>, subject to <the rights, privileges,
   1-19  duties, and powers of a possessory conservator as provided in
   1-20  Section 14.04 of this code and to> any limitation imposed by court
   1-21  order in allowing access to the child:
   1-22              (1)  a parent appointed as a conservator of a child has
   1-23  during the period that the parent has possession of the child:
   1-24                    (A)  the right to physical possession and to
    2-1  direct the moral and religious training of the child;
    2-2                    (B)  the duty of care, control, protection, and
    2-3  reasonable discipline of the child;
    2-4                    (C)  the duty to support the child, including
    2-5  providing the child with clothing, food, shelter, medical and
    2-6  dental care not involving an invasive procedure; and
    2-7                    (D)  the power to consent to medical, dental, and
    2-8  surgical treatment during an emergency involving an immediate
    2-9  danger to the health and safety of the child;
   2-10              (2)  each parent appointed as a conservator of a child
   2-11  has at all times:
   2-12                    (A)  the right of access to medical, dental,
   2-13  psychological, and educational records of the child;
   2-14                    (B)  the right to consult with any physician,
   2-15  dentist, or psychologist of the child;
   2-16                    (C)  the right to consult with school officials
   2-17  concerning the child's welfare and educational status, including
   2-18  school activities;
   2-19                    (D)  the right to attend school activities;
   2-20                    (E)  the right to be designated on any records as
   2-21  a person to be notified in case of an emergency; and
   2-22                    (F)  the right to manage the estate of the child
   2-23  to the extent the estate has been created by the parent or the
   2-24  parent's family; and
   2-25              (3)  a parent appointed as the sole managing
   2-26  conservator of a child exclusively has:
   2-27                    (A)  the right to the services and earnings of
    3-1  the child;
    3-2                    (B)  the power to consent to marriage, to
    3-3  enlistment in the armed forces of the United States, to medical,
    3-4  dental, and surgical treatment involving invasive procedures, and
    3-5  to psychiatric and psychological treatment;
    3-6                    (C)  the power to represent the child in legal
    3-7  action and  to make other decisions of substantial legal
    3-8  significance concerning the child, including the right to establish
    3-9  the child's legal domicile and the primary residence of the child,
   3-10  except when a guardian of the child's estate or a guardian or
   3-11  attorney ad litem has been appointed for the child, a power as an
   3-12  agent of the child to act in relation to the child's estate if the
   3-13  child's action is required by a state, the United States, or a
   3-14  foreign government; and
   3-15                    (D)  the power to receive and give receipt for
   3-16  periodic payments for the support of the child and to hold or
   3-17  disburse these funds for the benefit of the child.
   3-18        Explanation:  These changes are necessary to protect the best
   3-19  interest of the child relating to psychological and psychiatric
   3-20  treatment and to permit a parent who is a sole managing conservator
   3-21  of a child to establish the child's primary residence.
   3-22        (2)  Senate Rule 12.03(1) is suspended to permit the
   3-23  committee to change Subsection (a), Section 14.04, Family Code, to
   3-24  read as follows:
   3-25        (a)  A possessory conservator has the following rights,
   3-26  privileges, duties, and powers during the period of possession,
   3-27  subject to Section 14.02(b) of this code and any limitations
    4-1  expressed in the decree:
    4-2              (1)  the duty of care, control, protection, and
    4-3  reasonable discipline of the child;
    4-4              (2)  the duty to provide the child with clothing, food,
    4-5  and shelter; and
    4-6              (3)  the power to consent to medical, dental, and
    4-7  surgical treatment during an emergency involving an immediate
    4-8  danger to the health and safety of the child.
    4-9        Explanation:  These changes are necessary to protect the best
   4-10  interest of the child regarding psychological treatment of the
   4-11  child.
   4-12        (3)  Senate Rule 12.03(3) is suspended to permit the
   4-13  committee to add  changes to Section 14.053, Family Code, to read
   4-14  as follows:
   4-15        SECTION 8.  Section 14.053, Family Code, is amended by
   4-16  amending Subsections (b) and (d) and adding Subsection (l) to read
   4-17  as follows:
   4-18        (b)  Net Resources Defined.  "Net resources," for the purpose
   4-19  of determining child support liability, are 100 percent of all wage
   4-20  and salary income and other compensation for personal services
   4-21  (including commissions, overtime pay, tips, and bonuses), interest,
   4-22  dividends, royalty income, self-employment income (as described in
   4-23  Subsection (c) of this section), net rental income (defined as rent
   4-24  after deducting operating expenses and mortgage payments, but not
   4-25  including noncash items such as depreciation), and all other income
   4-26  actually being received, including but not limited to severance
   4-27  pay, retirement benefits, pensions, trust income, annuities,
    5-1  capital gains, social security benefits, unemployment benefits,
    5-2  disability and workers' compensation benefits, interest income from
    5-3  notes but not including return of principal or capital, <and/or>
    5-4  accounts receivable regardless of the source, gifts and prizes,
    5-5  spousal maintenance, and alimony, less (subtracting) 100 percent of
    5-6  social security taxes, federal income tax withholding for a single
    5-7  person claiming one personal exemption and the standard deduction,
    5-8  union dues, and expenses for health insurance coverage for the
    5-9  obligor's child.  Benefits paid pursuant to aid for families with
   5-10  dependent children and any other child support received from any
   5-11  source shall be disregarded in calculating net resources.
   5-12        (d)  Health Insurance.  The guidelines for a court order for
   5-13  the support of a child in this chapter assume that the court will
   5-14  order the obligor to provide health insurance coverage for the
   5-15  child subject of the suit in addition to the amount of child
   5-16  support calculated pursuant to these guidelines.  If the court
   5-17  finds and sets forth in the order setting child support that the
   5-18  obligee will maintain health insurance coverage at the obligee's
   5-19  expense for the child, the court may increase the amount of child
   5-20  support to be paid by the obligor in an amount not exceeding the
   5-21  total expense to the obligee for maintaining health insurance
   5-22  coverage.  As additional child support the court shall allocate
   5-23  between the parties according to the parties' circumstances the
   5-24  reasonable and necessary health care expenses of a child that are
   5-25  not reimbursed by health insurance.
   5-26        (l)  Retroactive Support.  The guidelines for the support of
   5-27  a child in this chapter are intended to guide the court in
    6-1  determining the amount of retroactive child support that may be
    6-2  ordered under this chapter or Chapter 13 of this code.  In ordering
    6-3  retroactive child support, the court shall consider the net
    6-4  resources of the obligor during the relevant time period.
    6-5        Explanation:  The change is needed to clarify how a court
    6-6  shall determine who is responsible for the payment of health care
    6-7  expenses not reimbursed by insurance and to provide that the child
    6-8  support guidelines apply to retroactive child support.
    6-9        (4)  Senate Rule 12.03(3) is suspended to permit the
   6-10  committee to add changes to Section 14.055, Family Code, to read as
   6-11  follows:
   6-12        SECTION 1.  Sections 14.055(a), (b), and (c), Family Code,
   6-13  are amended to read as follows:
   6-14        (a)  Rebuttable Presumption.  The guidelines for the support
   6-15  of a child in this chapter are specifically designed to apply to
   6-16  situations in which the obligor's monthly net resources are $6,000
   6-17  <$4,000> or less.  In any suit affecting the parent-child
   6-18  relationship, there is a rebuttable presumption that an order
   6-19  containing the amount of periodic child support payments
   6-20  established by the schedule provided in this section is reasonable
   6-21  and that the order is in the best interest of the child.  A court
   6-22  may determine that the application of the guidelines would be
   6-23  unjust or inappropriate under the circumstances.
   6-24        (b)  Schedule:  $6,000 <$4,000> or Less Monthly Net
   6-25  Resources.  In rendering an order of child support under
   6-26  circumstances in which the obligor's monthly net resources are
   6-27  $6,000 <$4,000> or less, the court shall presumptively apply the
    7-1  following schedule:
    7-2                       CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES
    7-3           BASED ON THE MONTHLY NET RESOURCES OF THE OBLIGOR
    7-4  1 child            20% of Obligor's Net Resources
    7-5  2 children         25% of Obligor's Net Resources
    7-6  3 children         30% of Obligor's Net Resources
    7-7  4 children         35% of Obligor's Net Resources
    7-8  5<+> children      40% of Obligor's Net Resources <Not  less  than
    7-9                     the amount for 4 children>
   7-10  6+ children        Not less than the amount for 5 children
   7-11        (c)  More Than $6,000 <$4,000> Monthly Net Resources.  In
   7-12  situations in which the obligor's net resources exceed $6,000
   7-13  <$4,000> per month, the court shall presumptively apply the
   7-14  percentage guidelines in Subsection (b) of this section to the
   7-15  first $6,000 <$4,000> of the obligor's net resources.  Without
   7-16  further reference to the percentage recommended by these
   7-17  guidelines, the court may order additional amounts of child support
   7-18  as appropriate <proven,> depending on the income of the parties and
   7-19  the proven needs of the child <at the time of the order>.  The
   7-20  proper calculation of a child support order that exceeds the
   7-21  presumptive amount established for the first $6,000 of the
   7-22  obligor's net resources requires that the entire amount of the
   7-23  presumptive award be subtracted from the proven total needs of the
   7-24  child.  After the presumptive award is subtracted, the court shall
   7-25  allocate between the parties the responsibility to meet the
   7-26  additional needs of the child according to the circumstances of the
   7-27  parties.  However, in no event may the obligor be required to pay
    8-1  more than an amount equal to 100 percent of the proven needs of the
    8-2  child as child support.
    8-3        Explanation:  The change is needed to clarify the manner in
    8-4  which the amount of the child support obligation of an obligor with
    8-5  monthly net resources of over $6,000 and to address the Texas
    8-6  Supreme Court's decision in Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 1993 WL 165364
    8-7  (Tex).
    8-8                                 _____________________________________
    8-9                                        President of the Senate
   8-10                                      I hereby certify that the
   8-11                                 above Resolution was adopted by
   8-12                                 the Senate on May 28, 1993.
   8-13                                 _____________________________________
   8-14                                        Secretary of the Senate