BILL ANALYSIS H.B. 463 By: Brimer 04-29-95 Committee Report (Amended) BACKGROUND Under current law, there is no statutory authority to impose civil penalties regarding violations of county flood plain regulations. Counties do not currently have authority to declare violation of their respective regulations a civil violation without a statute declaring the penalty for such a violation. The Health and Safety Code contains sections that authorize county regulation and provide various penalties for violation. The Water Code does not provide for injunctive action for flood plain violations. It has also been argued that the extent of a county's authority is only that the county may declare the property in violation and notify the secretary of HUD or his designee.. PURPOSE To give counties statutory authority to enforce their flood plain regulations through civil penalties for violations of those regulations. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1 Amends Subchapter I, Chapter 16, Water Code, by adding Sections 16.322 and 16.323. Sec. 16.322 stipulates civil penalties for persons in violation of this subchapter, or a rule adopted or order issued under this subchapter to be not more than $100 for each act of violation and for each day of violation. Sec. 16.323 stipulates how a political subdivision may institute a civil suit in district court for injunctive relief (including an order directing the person to remove illegal improvements and restore preexisting conditions), the assessment and recovery of civil penalties (as provided for by Section 16.322), or both. SECTION 2 Effective date: September 1, 1995. SECTION 3 Emergency clause. EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS COMMITTEE AMENDMENT NO. 1 Amends SECTION 1 of the bill to add a new Subsection (c) to Section 16.323, Water Code, which limits application of the bill to counties containing two or more cities with a population of 250,000 or more. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION H.B. 463 was considered by the committee in a public hearing on February 14, 1995. The following persons testified in favor of the bill: Representative Kim Brimer; Ray Rike, representing Tarrant County; Jon Weist, representing Tarrant County Commissioner Marti VanRavenswaay; and David Carroll, representing the Travis County Public Improvements and Transportation Department. The bill was left pending. H.B. 463 was considered by the committee in a public hearing on February 21, 1995. The bill was referred to a subcommittee consisting of Representatives Mowery, Alexander, and Howard. After being recalled from subcommittee, the bill was considered by the committee in a formal meeting on April 24, 1995. The committee considered one amendment to the bill, which was adopted without objection. The bill was reported favorably as amended, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, by a record vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, 0 pnv, 1 absent.