BILL ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 483 By: Denny April 18, 1995 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND Under current law it is difficult to trace where contributions given to judicial candidates by a political party originate. This allows contributors to remain anonymous by allowing them to make contributions to a political party and then designating that the contribution be given to the judicial candidate of their choice. PURPOSE As proposed, CSHB 483 would require the state chairman of each political party that had nominees on the general election ballot file with the commission a sworn statement stating that they have not contributed to a candidate money that was designated by a contributor to be used for a particular candidate. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 253.001, Election Code, CONTRIBUTION OR EXPENDITURE IN ANOTHER'S NAME PROHIBITED. (a) to require a contributor to notify the recipient of the contribution and to give the contributor's name and address for disclosure purposes; (b) to require a person making a political expenditure on the behalf of or in the name of a candidate to disclose in writing that expenditure to the person on whose behalf the expenditure is made; and (c) renumbers this section providing the criminal penalty. SECTION 2. Amends Chapter 257, Election Code, by adding Section 257.008 to require the state and county party chair of each political party that had nominees on the general election ballot file with the commission a sworn statement that includes their name, title, county, and name of political party, and an acknowledgement that any political contribution made to a candidate for judicial office was not designated for a particular candidate by the person making the contribution to the party. SECTION 3. Effective date. SECTION 4. Transition clause relating to the effective date of offenses committed under Section 253.001 of the Election Code. SECTION 5. Transition clause relating to the applicability of Section 257.008, Election Code. SECTION 6. Emergency clause. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE The substitute to HB 483 adds SECTION 1 to the original bill. SECTION 1 changes the language of the Election Code to clarify the law regarding political contributions and expenditures by political parties. The substitute the HB 483 also adds SECTION 4 which is a transition clause that makes offenses under this bill only applicable to offenses committed after the effective date of this bill. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION HB 483 was considered by the Committee on Elections in a public hearing on March 1, 1995. For purposes of testimony, the Committee considered the following related bills together: HB 262 (Madden), HB 483 (Denny), HB 926 (Duncan), and HB 1110 (Greenberg). The following persons testified in favor of HB 483: Justice Craig Enoch of the Texas Supreme Court; and Justice Tom Phillips of the Texas Supreme Court. The following person testified neutrally on HB 483: Ed Martin representing the Texas Democratic Party; and Steve McDonald representing the Texas Democratic Party. The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Judicial Finance Reform; a Subcommittee consisting of Representatives Madden (Chair), Danburg, Denny, Munoz, Crabb, Jones, and Ehrhardt. HB 483 was considered by the Committee on Elections, Subcommittee on Judicial Finance Reform, in a work session on March 15, 1995. HB 483 was considered by the Committee on Election, Subcommittee on Judicial Finance Reform, in a public hearing on March 29, 1995. HB 483 was left pending. After being recalled from subcommittee, the bill was considered by the committee in a public hearing on March 29, 1995. The Committee considered 1 amendment to the bill. The amendment was adopted as Committee amendment number one to HB 483 without objection. The following person testified in favor of HB 483 as amended: Steve McDonald representing the Texas Democratic Party. The bill was reported favorably as amended with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed and be sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars, by a record vote of 7 AYES, 0 NAYS, 1 PNV, 1 ABSENT. On April 5, 1995, in a public hearing, the vote by which 483 was reported favorably as amended with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed and be sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars was reconsidered without objection. The Committee considered a complete substitute for the bill. The substitute to HB 483 was adopted without objection. The bill was reported favorably as substituted with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed and be sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars, by a record vote of 6 AYES, 0 NAYS, 0 PNV, 3 ABSENT.