BILL ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 875 By: Pickett 03-02-95 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND As representation broadened in many municipalities through single member districting, many important boards and commissions also increased in size to allow for a wider diversity of members. However, since the numbers of members permitted on boards of adjustment was determined by statute, these very critical boards could not be expanded without the approval of Legislature. PURPOSE As proposed, H.B. 875 would give municipalities the authority to expand the membership of Zoning Boards of Adjustment to more adequately reflect the diversity of their individual communities. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 211.008(b) of the Local Government Code by adding the words "at least" when this section refers to 5 members of the board of adjustment. Additionally this section is amended to provide clarity in stating that the governing body must provide a procedure for appointing members to the board. Additionally, it states that the governing body may authorize each member of the governing body, including a mayor to appoint one member to the board. In providing further clarity, Section 211.008(d) is amended to remove the reference of "four" members being required to hear a case and replacing that reference with a stipulation that each case must be heard by 75% of the members. SECTION 2. Amends Section 211.009(c) of the Local Government Code to permit a concurring vote of 75 percent of the Board of Adjustment to take action. SECTION 3. Emergency clause. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE The substitute added Section 2, requiring a concurring vote of 75 percent of the Board of Adjustment to take action. It also reduced the percentage required from 80 to 75 percent for a Board of Adjustment to hear matters. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION H.B. 875 was considered in public hearing on March 6, 1995. The following persons testified in favor of the bill: Representative Pickett; and Terry L. Williams, representing the City of El Paso. The committee considered a complete substitute for the bill. One amendment was offered to the substitute. That amendment was adopted by a non-record vote. The substitute, as amended, was adopted without objection. The bill was reported favorably, as substituted, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, by a record vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, 0 pnvs, and 1 absent.