BILL ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 894 By: Naishtat 04-03-95 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) and the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (DPRS) have experienced increasing strain and pressure due to the rise in the number of persons eligible for services and cases reported for investigation. With the state's shrinking budgetary capacity, front-line employees of these agencies often are forced to bear an unwieldy burden. Texas has been sanctioned by the federal government heavily for high error rates in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and food stamp programs. Questions have been raised concerning whether the workload borne by caseworkers is too high to allow them to do an adequate -- much less accurate -- job. Texas has no performance measures or other standards regarding what constitutes an appropriate caseload that an employee can reasonably be expected to handle efficiently and effectively during a normal work week. PURPOSE H.B. 894 would establish two agency caseload standards advisory committees to review the number and types of cases handled by caseworkers and to make recommendations regarding maximum and minimum caseload standards for workers employed by DHS and DPRS. The Commissioner of Health and Human Services would be authorized to consider these recommendations when establishing caseload standards for the two agencies. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY H.B. 894 grants to Commissioner of Health and Human Services the authority to adopt rules in Section 4(b). SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 1, Article 4413(502), Revised Statutes, by adding "caseload standards" and "professional caseload standards" to the list of definitions. SECTION 2. Amends Article 4413(502), Rev. Stat. by adding new Section 22, to read as follows: Sec. 22. (a) Permits the Commissioner of Health and Human Services to establish caseload and other standards for each category of caseworker employed by DHS and DPRS, after consideration of the advisory committees' recommendations. (b) Sets forth requirements for the Health & Human Services (HHS) Commissioner in establishing caseload standards. (c) Subject to the availability of funds, requires the heads of DHS and DPRS to use the standards established by the HHS Commissioner to determine the number of personnel to hire for their respective agencies. (d) Subject to the availability of funds, requires DHS and DPRS to use the standards established by the HHS Commissioner to assign caseloads to individual agency caseworkers. (e) Requires the HHS Commissioner to include recommendations of the caseload standards advisory committees in agency strategic plans. SECTION 3. Amends Article 4413(502), Rev. Stat. by adding new Section 23 as follows: Sec. 23. CASELOAD STANDARDS ADVISORY COMMITTEES. (a) Establishes caseload committees in DHS and DPRS. (b) Sets forth requirements for the composition of the caseload committee. (c) Requires the HHS Commissioner to make appointments to the advisory committee based on lists submitted by the heads of DHS and DPRS. (d) Permits members of the advisory committees to serve at the pleasure of the HHS Commissioner. (e) Requires the advisory committees to review caseload standards and make recommendations to the HHS Commissioner on maximum and minimum caseloads, and on waiving certain reporting standards when a worker's caseload exceeds the maximum. (f) Requires the HHS Commissioner to dissolve an advisory committee if he or she determines the body is no longer necessary. SECTION 4. (a) Requires advisory committees to make recommendations by March 1, 1996. (b) Requires the HHS Commissioner to adopt rules prescribing caseload standards by September 1, 1997. SECTION 5. Effective date, September 1, 1995. SECTION 6. Emergency clause. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE In the substitute, Section 22(a) was changed to allow the Health & Human Services Commissioner to establish caseload standards, but not require him or her to do so. The substitute also added Section 22(b)(5) to ensure that the established standards are consistent with those of other state agencies. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION The Human Services Committee considered H.B. 894 in a public hearing on March 20, 1995. A complete substitute for the bill was offered. The following witnesses testified for H.B. 894: Shannon Noble, Texas Network of Youth Services; Jere Locke, Texas State Employees Union; Mike Bright, ARC of Texas; James Templeton, ADAPT, Austin. The following witness testified as neutral on H.B. 894: Susan Watkins, Dept. of Protective and Regulatory Services. No one testified against H.B. 894. The substitute was withdrawn and H.B. 894 was left pending. On April 3, 1995, the committee took up H.B. 894 which had been pending. Rep. Naishtat offered a committee substitute for H.B. 894. The substitute was adopted without objection. Rep. Maxey moved to report H.B. 894 favorably as substituted and the motion prevailed by a record vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays, 0 PNV, 0 absent.