BILL ANALYSIS H.B. 1856 By: Dear 4-20-95 Committee Report (Unamended) BACKGROUND Currently, the municipal court in White Settlement is not a court of record. This means that all persons issued citations in the City of White Settlement have an automatic right of appeal to county courts. The defendant need only plead no contest or guilty, give notice of appeal, submit a surety bond and the case is appealed to the county. At the county level, a new trial is held on the merits without regard to anything that might have happened at municipal court. In practice, what happens at the county level is either the backlog is so great that the citations are never reached, or if the case is reached, there is a plea bargain with costs going to the county. The ease of appeal from a municipal court that is not a court of record impairs the city's ability to enforce traffic laws and local ordinances. An appeal from a municipal court of record may only occur after trial, and may only be based upon errors of law. PURPOSE To permit the city of White Settlement to establish their municipal court as a municipal court of record, so it may more effectively enforce its ordinances and traffic laws. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1 amends Chapter 30 of the Government Code by adding subchapter W as follows: Sec. 30.881 provides that this subchapter shall apply to the City of White Settlement. Sec. 30.882 (a) permits the governing body of the City to create a municipal court of record by ordinance. Sec. 30.883 provides that the general law regarding municipal courts and any charter provision or ordinance relating to municipal courts apply to the court of record unless they are in conflict with this subchapter. Sec. 30.884 provides for a municipal judge to be appointed by the governing body of the city, and establishes the qualifications for appointment, guidelines for salary, terms of renewal and parameters of authority for the judge. The governing body may fill vacancies in the office of municipal judge and appoint alternate judges. Sec. 30.885 provides for the appointment of a clerk of the municipal court of record and establishes the clerk's duties. Sec. 30.886 provides for the appointment of a qualified court reporter who may use written notes, transcribing equipment, video/audio recording equipment or a combination of those methods to record the proceedings of municipal court. As with most municipal courts of record, the court reporter is not required to be present at trial and need only transcribe the proceedings from the recording in the event of an appeal. Sec. 30.887 provides that prosecutions in the municipal court of record will be conducted by the city attorney or deputy city attorney. Sec. 30.888 provides that any person brought before the municipal court of record charged with an offense is entitled to be tried by a jury of six persons, unless that right is waived. Sec. 30.889 provides that a defendent, and not the state, has a right to appeal from a judgment or conviction in the municipal court of record on the basis of errors. The county criminal courts of Tarrant County have jurisdiction over the appeal, which may not be trial by de novo. To perfect an appeal, the defendant must file a written motion for new trial which sets forth the points of error of which the defendant complains. The defendant must also give notice of the appeal upon the overruling of the motion for new trial. Sec.30.890 provides that an appeal may not be taken unless a bond approved by the court is filed not later than the tenth day after the motion for a new trial, and sets forth requirements for the bond. Sec. 30.891 details the required contents of the record on appeal. The defendant is required to pay the cost of transcription unless the court finds that the defendant is unable to pay. If the case is reversed on appeal, the court must refund the cost of transcription to the defendant. Sec. 30.892 requires the clerk to prepare a transcript of the court proceedings if requested by the defendant and sets forth what must be included in the transcript. Sec. 30.893 provides that either party may include bills of exception in the transcript if they are timely filed with the municipal court clerk. Sec. 30.894 sets forth what must be contained in a statement of facts if required to be included in a record on appeal. Sec. 30.895 provides for the completion, approval and transfer of the record upon appeal to the county appellate court. Sec. 30.896 provides that the defendant and prosecutor must file briefs with the clerk and establishes the time period in which the briefs must be filed. Sec. 30.897 provides that, except as modified by this Subchapter, the Code of Criminal Procedure governs the trial of cases before the municipal court of record and that the court may make and enforce rules of practice and procedure necessary to expedite the trial cases not inconsistent with general law. A bond must be payable to the state for the use and benefit of the city. A peace officer may serve process issued by the municipal courts of record. The county appellate courts can make and enforce rules of practice and procedure not inconsistent with general law to expedite appeals. Sec. 30.898 authorizes the appellate court to, according to the law and nature of the case, affirm the judgment of the municipal court, reverse and remand the case for a new trial, reverse and dismiss the case, or reform and correct the judgment. The appellate court is directed to deliver a written opinion order either sustaining or overruling each assignment of error presented to the court and to mail copies of the decision to all parties. Sec. 30.899 requires the county appellate court to certify the appellate proceedings and mail the certificate to the municipal court. If the municipal court proceedings were affirmed, further action to enforce the judgment is not necessary except to forfeit the bond, issue a writ of capias or issue an execution against the defendant's property. Sec. 30.899 requires the county appellate court to certify the appellate proceedings and mail the certificate to the municipal court. If the municipal court proceedings were affirmed, further futher action to enforce the judgment is not necessary except to forfiet the bond, issue a writ of capias or issue an execution against the defendant's property. Sec. 30.900 provides that if the appellate court awards a new trial to the defendant, the case is tried in the municipal court of record as if a new trial had been granted by the court of record. Sec. 30.901 provides that the defendant may appeal to the court of appeals if the fine assessed exceeds $100.00 and if the judgment is affirmed by the county appellate court. Provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to appeals from a county or a district court apply to the appeal except the record and brief on appeal constitute the record, and the record and brief shall be filed directly with the Court of Appeals. SECTION 2. Emergency clause. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION Pursuant to a public notice posted on March 8, 1995, the Committee on Judicial Affairs met in a public hearing on March 14, 1995, to consider H.B. 1856. No action was taken on H.B. 1856 at the committee's March 14 hearing. Pursuant to a public notice posted on April 6, 1995, the Committee on Judicial Affairs met in a formal meeting on April 20, 1995, to consider H.B. 1856. The Chair laid out H.B. 1856 and explained the bill. Rep. Goodman moved that H.B. 1856 be reported favorably back to the full House, without amendment, with the recommendation that it do pass, be printed and sent to the Local & Consent Calendars Committee. The motion prevailed by the following record vote: 7 ayes, 0 nays, 0 PNV and 2 absent.