BILL ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 2199 By: Raymond 04-19-95 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND The theft of agricultural chemicals has become popular on the black market. The circulation of stolen chemicals in a community can result in environmental misfortunes such as careless disposal and pesticides in community water supplies. The inability to document the circulation of chemicals can create a hazardous situation for the public. Currently, it is difficult for law enforcement officials to prove theft of agricultural chemicals. PURPOSE If enacted, C.S.H.B. 2199 would provide punishments for pesticide theft. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 31.03, Penal Code (THEFT), by amending Subsections (c) and by adding Subsection (g) as follows: (c) provides that for purposes of Subsection (b) an actor who purchases or receives from any source other than a licensed retailer or distributor of pesticides, a restricted-use pesticide, or a state-limited-use pesticide or a compound, mixture, or preparation containing a restricted-use or state-limited-use pesticide is presumed to know on the receipt by the actor that the pesticide has been previously stolen if the actor fails to provide certain information. (g) defines "restricted-use pesticide" and "state-limited-use pesticide." SECTION 2. (a) Change in law made by this Act applies only to an offense committed on or after the effective date of the Act. (b) Makes application of this Act prospective. SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 1995. SECTION 4. Emergency clause. COMPARISON OF SUBSTITUTE TO ORIGINAL SECTION 1 of original, amending Section 15.03, Penal Code, is deleted. SECTION 1 of substitute, amending Section 31.03, Penal Code, no longer amends Subsection (e). SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION HB 2199 was considered by the full committee in a public hearing on April 19, 1995. The following person testified in favor of the bill: Jon Fisher, representing the Texas Ag Industries Association. The Chair the following person testified on the bill: Rob Kepple, representing TDCAA. The committee considered a complete substitute for the bill. The substitute was adopted by a non-record vote. HB 2199 was reported favorably as substituted, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, by a record vote of 5 ayes, 0 nays, 0 pnv, and 4 absent.