BILL ANALYSIS H.B. 2580 By: Howard April 21, 1995 Committee Report (Amended) BACKGROUND Section 130.003 (State Appropriation for Public Junior Colleges), Education Code, establishes six qualifications that a junior college must meet to receive state funding. One of those qualifications is that a junior college must levy and collect ad valorem taxes for the operation and maintenance of the college. It might be easier to qualify if junior colleges could receive an annual contribution of sales and use taxes pledged for the benefit of the junior college. PURPOSE This bill would allow a public junior college to be eligible for state funding if it collects ad valorem taxes or receives an annual contribution of sales and use taxes. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 130.003 (State Appropriation for Public Junior Colleges), Subsection (b)(6), Education Code, to allow a junior college to be eligible for and receive a share of the appropriation if it receives either a contribution of sales and use taxes pledged to the use and benefit of the public junior college, or if it levies and collects ad valorem taxes. SECTION 2. Amends Subchapter G, Chapter 130 (Junior College Districts), Education Code, by adding Section 130.1215 SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES. Allows a junior college district to use revenue collected from sales and use taxes that is pledged to benefit the public junior college, in the same manner as ad valorem taxes collected by the district. SECTION 3. Emergency Clause. EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS COMMITTEE AMENDMENT #1 would specify that the bill only applies to junior colleges in counties with a population between 223,000 and 235,000. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION Public notice was posted in accordance with the rules, and a public hearing was held on April 11, 1995. Representative Howard explained the bill. Without objection, H.B. 2580 was left pending before the committee. On April 18, 1995, the committee met in a public hearing, and H.B. 2580 was laid out on pending business. The Committee considered amendment #1 by Representative Craddick. Without objection, the committee adopted committee amendment #1. By a record vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, 0 present not voting and 3 absent, the committee voted to report H.B. 2580 to the House with amendment with the recommendation that it be sent to the Local & Consent Calendar, and that it do pass. Testimony received in favor of the bill (4/11/95): Herb Appel, representing himself and the Greater Fort Bend Economic Development Council Gene Reed, representing the Sugar Land Development Corporation Gerald G. Eagleson, representing himself Peter Slot, representing himself and the Greater Ft. Bend Economic Development Council Neutral testimony received on the bill (4/11/95): Don W. Brown, representing the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board