BILL ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 2788 By: Oliveira May 4, 1995 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND A default judgment may be reversed against an out of state defendant if the defendant has not received notice of the proceeding. That defendant may also have a default judgment reversed even if there is an error in the way the case is pled or if they refuse to claim their certified mail, and even when the defendant did in fact have actual notice of the pending proceeding at an address previously agreed to in a written agreement. The out of state defendant must only file a "writ of error" stating that the Texas resident did not follow the procedure for pleading or service of process to the letter, possibly by leaving out specific wording in the petition to the secretary of state, such as "home or home office" when referring to the residence of the out of state defendant. PURPOSE The bill would prevent an out of state defendant from evading service. Specifically, if an out of state defendant does business in Texas and fails to designate a registered agent, and then enters into a written agreement designating a specific address for service, that defendant should be precluded from reversing a default judgment by claiming lack of service of process when notice is sent to the address specified by the defendant in the written agreement. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 17.045 (a) and (d), Civil Practice and Remedies Code, by adding language pertaining to party's requests for services and requirements that notices be sent registered mail. SECTION 2. Emergency clause - effective immediately. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE In Section 17.045 (a) language is added to require the party requesting service to provide a statement with the address where it is reasonably believed that the nonresident can be served with process, to the Secretary of State. Includes in Section 17.045 (d) a requirement that all process or notice referenced in this section be sent registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Whether the nonresident takes possession of the notice, process is effective upon receipt of proof that the resident has actual or constructive notice of the lawsuit thirty days prior to the entering of a default judgment. Deletes the language in the original bill in Section 17.045 (f). The deleted language provided that no default judgment would be invalidated if it shall be proved that the person against whom the judgment was taken had received actual or constructive notice at least twenty days prior to the entry of the default judgment. Allows thirty days instead of twenty days for notice prior to the entering of the default judgment. Deletes the requirement that the designated address in the written contract be the place for service of process. The new language allows the party requesting service on the nonresident from the secretary to designate the address where the requestor reasonably believes the nonresident may be served with process. The new language does not mention the 180 day evidentiary hearing as mentioned in the original bill. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION H.B. 2788 was considered in a public hearing on April 19, 1995 by the Committee on Civil Practices. The following individuals testified in support of the bill: Aaron L. Jackson, attorney, representing himself and Bob Walker; Robert Walker, representing himself; and Mike Slack, attorney, representing himself and the Texas Trial Lawyers Association. No one testified in opposition to or neutrally on the bill. The committee considered a complete substitute, which was adopted without objection. The bill was left pending. H.B. 2788 was considered during a formal meeting on May 2, 1995. H.B. 2788 was reported favorably, as substituted, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, by a record vote of five ayes, zero nays, one pnv and three absent.