BILL ANALYSIS H.B. 3008 By: Giddings 04-06-95 Committee Report (Unamended) BACKGROUND The Interim Special House Committee on Small business Access to capital recommended several changes to the banking laws in Texas in its interim report. One recommendation was to "revise the... Code and usury laws to permit reasonable loan fees for a smaller loan base." PURPOSE This bill revises the Banking Code to allow banks to charge reasonable fees for loan processing and other related costs. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Art. 342-508(a), Banking Code, is amended as follows: Art. 342-508. LOAN FEES. (a) establishes that a bank may require a borrower to pay reasonable fees and expenses in making, closing, disbursing, extending, readjusting, or renewing loans. Fees may not exceed cost the bank reasonably expects to incur. Payment of fees may be collected and retained by banks or paid to a third party or fees may be bade by borrowers directly to the third party. Banks are not authorized to charge borrowers for payment of fees and expenses to banks' officers, directors, managers, or managing participants for services in connection with their duties as such. If any conflict arises between this article and Subtitle 2 or Chapter 15, Title 79, Revised Statutes (Art. 5069-2.01 et seq. V.T.C.S.), Title 79 prevails. (b) Banks may charge penalties for prepayments or late payments. Limits to one the number of penalties for each past due payment. Principal prepayments must be credited to the final note installment until the final installment is paid and then credited to installments in inverse order of maturity. (c) Fees and expenses charged are not considered part of the interest or compensation charged by banks for money. (All language concerning "PROHIBITED EXCEPTION." is struck.) SECTION 2. Act applies only to loan transactions on or after the effective date of the Act. SECTION 3. Effective date. SECTION 4. Emergency clause. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION The committee considered HB 3008 in a public hearing on April 10, 1995. The following person testified in favor of the bill: Karen Neeley. The motion to report HB 3008 favorably without amendments, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed and be sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars, prevailed by the following record vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 0 PNV, 1 Absent.