BILL ANALYSIS
H.B. 3008
By: Giddings
04-06-95
Committee Report (Unamended)
BACKGROUND
The Interim Special House Committee on Small business Access to
capital recommended several changes to the banking laws in Texas in
its interim report. One recommendation was to "revise the... Code
and usury laws to permit reasonable loan fees for a smaller loan
base."
PURPOSE
This bill revises the Banking Code to allow banks to charge
reasonable fees for loan processing and other related costs.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly
grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer,
department, agency, or institution.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Art. 342-508(a), Banking Code, is amended as follows:
Art. 342-508. LOAN FEES. (a) establishes that a bank may
require a borrower to pay reasonable fees and expenses in
making, closing, disbursing, extending, readjusting, or
renewing loans. Fees may not exceed cost the bank reasonably
expects to incur. Payment of fees may be collected and
retained by banks or paid to a third party or fees may be bade
by borrowers directly to the third party. Banks are not
authorized to charge borrowers for payment of fees and
expenses to banks' officers, directors, managers, or managing
participants for services in connection with their duties as
such. If any conflict arises between this article and
Subtitle 2 or Chapter 15, Title 79, Revised Statutes (Art.
5069-2.01 et seq. V.T.C.S.), Title 79 prevails.
(b) Banks may charge penalties for prepayments or late
payments. Limits to one the number of penalties for each past
due payment. Principal prepayments must be credited to the
final note installment until the final installment is paid and
then credited to installments in inverse order of maturity.
(c) Fees and expenses charged are not considered part of the
interest or compensation charged by banks for money.
(All language concerning "PROHIBITED EXCEPTION." is struck.)
SECTION 2. Act applies only to loan transactions on or after the
effective date of the Act.
SECTION 3. Effective date.
SECTION 4. Emergency clause.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION
The committee considered HB 3008 in a public hearing on April 10, 1995.
The following person testified in favor of the bill:
Karen Neeley.
The motion to report HB 3008 favorably without amendments, with the recommendation that it do
pass and be printed and be sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars, prevailed by the
following record vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 0 PNV, 1 Absent.