BILL ANALYSIS



H.B. 3237
By: Dear
05-12-95
Committee Report (Unamended)



BACKGROUND

     Currently, the municipal court in Lake Worth is not a court of
record. This means that all citations issued in the City of Lake
Worth have an automatic right of appeal to county courts. The
defendant need only plead no contest or guilty, give notice of
appeal, submit a surety bond and the case is appealed to the
county. At the county level, theoretically a new trial is held on
the merits without regard to anything that might have happened at
municipal court. In practice, what happens at the county level is
either the backlog is so great that the citations are never
reached, or if the case is reached, there is a plea bargain with
costs going to the county. The ease of appeal from a municipal
court that is not a court of record impairs the city's ability to
enforce traffic laws and local ordinances. An appeal from a
municipal court of record may only occur after trial, and may only
be based upon errors of law.


PURPOSE

     To permit the city of Lake Worth to establish their municipal
court as a municipal court of record, so it may more effectively
enforce its ordinances and traffic laws.


RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

     It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not
expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, department, agency or institution.


SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

     SECTION 1 amends Chapter 30 of the Government Code by adding
subchapter HH to read as follows:
           Sec. 30.2801 provides that this subchapter shall apply
     to the City of River Oaks.
           Sec. 30.2802 permits the governing body of the City to
     create a municipal court of record by ordinance.
           Sec. 30.2803 provides that the general law regarding
     municipal courts or justice courts and any charter provision
     or ordinance relating to municipal courts apply to the court
     of record unless they are in conflict with this subchapter.
           Sec. 30.2804 provides for a municipal judge to be
     appointed by the governing body of the city, and establishes
     the qualifications for appointment, guidelines for salary,
     terms of renewal and parameters of authority for the judge. 
     The governing body may fill vacancies in the office of
     municipal judge and appoint alternate judges.
           Sec. 30.2805 provides for the appointment of one or more
     magistrates and establishes the magistrates qualifications and
     duties.
           Sec. 30.2806 provides for the appointment of a clerk of
     the municipal court of record and establishes the clerk's
     duties.
           Sec. 30.2807 provides for the appointment of a qualified
     court reporter who may use written notes, transcribing
     equipment, video/audio recording equipment or a combination of
     those methods to record the proceedings of municipal court. 
     As with most municipal courts of record, the court reporter is
     not required to be present at trial and need only transcribe
     the proceedings from the recording in the event of an appeal.
           Sec. 30.2808 provides that prosecutions in the municipal
     court of record will be conducted by the city attorney or
     assistant or deputy city attorney.
           Sec. 30.2809 provides that any person brought before the
     municipal court of record charged with an offense is entitled
     to be tried by a jury of six persons, unless that right is
     waived.
           Sec. 30.2810 provides that a defendant, and not the
     state, has a right to appeal from a judgment or conviction in
     the municipal court of record on the basis of errors.  The
     county criminal courts of Tarrant County have jurisdiction
     over the appeal, which may not be by trial de novo.  To
     perfect an appeal, the defendant must file a written motion
     for new trial which sets forth the points of error of which
     the defendant complains.  The defendant must give notice of
     the appeal upon the overruling of the motion for new trial.
           Sec.30.2811 provides that an appeal may not be taken
     unless a bond approved by the court is filed not later than
     the tenth day after the motion for a new trial, and sets forth
     requirements for the bond.
           Sec. 30.2812 details the required contents of the record
     on appeal.  The defendant is required to pay the cost of
     transcription unless the court finds that the defendant is
     unable to pay.  If the case is reversed on appeal, the court
     must refund the cost of transcription to the defendant.
           Sec. 30.2813 requires the clerk to prepare a transcript
     of the court proceedings if requested by the defendant and
     sets forth what must be included in the transcript.
           Sec. 30.2814 provides that either party may include
     bills of exception in the transcript if they are timely filed
     with the municipal court clerk.
           Sec. 30.2815 sets forth what must be contained in a
     statement of facts if required to be included in a record on
     appeal.
           Sec. 30.2816 provides for the completion, approval and
     transfer of the record upon appeal to the county appellate
     court.
           Sec. 30.2817 provides that the defendant and prosecutor
     must file briefs with the clerk and establishes the time
     period in which the briefs must be filed.
           Sec. 30.2818 provides that, except as modified by this
     Subchapter, the Code of Criminal Procedure governs the trial
     of cases before the municipal court of record and that the
     court may make and enforce rules of practice and procedure
     necessary to expedite the trial cases not inconsistent with
     general law.  A bond must be payable to the state for the use
     and benefit of the city.  A peace officer may serve process
     issued by the municipal courts of record.  The county
     appellate courts can make and enforce rules of practice and
     procedure not inconsistent with general law to expedite
     appeals.
           Sec. 30.2819 authorizes the appellate court to,
     according to the law and nature of the case, affirm the
     judgment of the municipal court, reverse and remand the case
     for a new trial, reverse and dismiss the case, or reform and
     correct the judgment.  The appellate court is directed to
     deliver a written opinion order either sustaining or
     overruling each assignment of error presented to the court and
     to mail copies of the decision to all parties.
           Sec. 30.2820 requires the county appellate court to
     certify the appellate proceedings and mail the certificate to
     the municipal court. If the municipal court proceedings were
     affirmed, further action to enforce the judgment is not
     necessary except to forfeit the bond, issue a writ of capias
     or issue an execution against the defendant's property.
           Sec. 30.2821 provides that if the appellate court awards
     a new trial to the defendant, the case is tried in the
     municipal court of record as if a new trial had been granted
     by the court of record.
           Sec. 30.2822 provides that the defendant may appeal to
     the court of appeals if the fine assessed exceeds $100.00 and
     if the judgment is affirmed by the county appellate court. 
     Provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to
     appeals from a county or a district court apply to the appeal
     except the record and brief on appeal constitute the record,
     and the record and brief shall be filed directly with the
     Court of Appeals.
           Sec. 30.2823 provides for the creation of joint courts
     of record.
           Sec. 30.2824 provides for the appointment and term of
     municipal judges for the joint municipal courts of record.
           Sec. 30.2825 provides for the jurisdiction of a joint
           municipal court of record.
           Sec. 30.2826 provides for the selection of prosecuting
           attorneys for joint courts.
           Sec. 30.2827 provides for the method by which procedural
     requirements are selected for the operation of the joint
     municipal courts of record.

     SECTION 2.  Emergency clause.  Effective date.


SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

     Pursuant to an announcement made on the House Floor while the
House was still in session of May 12, 1995, the Committee on
Judicial Affairs met in a formal meeting on May 12, 1995, to
consider H.B. 3237.  The Chair laid out H.B. 3237 and explained the
bill.  Rep. Goodman moved to report H.B. 3237 favorably back to the
full House, without amendment, with the recommendation that it do
pass, be printed and sent to the Committee on Local and Consent
Calendars.  The motion prevailed by the following record vote:  5
ayes, 0 nays, 0 PNV and 4 absent.