BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 192 By: Henderson (Uher) 02-14-95 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) was statutorily created in 1941 to specialize in the research, treatment, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. Since that time, it has become internationally recognized for its work in these areas. However, a recent shift in the health care marketplace has had an adverse economic impact on state-operated, specialty hospitals. Total revenues at MDA dropped 10 percent during the last fiscal year and are dropping at the same rate this year. Consultants hired by M.D. Anderson have made a number of recommendations for its future, including both internal measures, such as employment entrenchment, and external measures, such as reducing state regulations that apply to MDA and not to private-sector counterparts. PURPOSE As proposed, C.S.S.B. 192 sets forth more flexible regulations and responsibilities and increases internal programs of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center concerning indigent patient treatment, financial responsibilities, incentive retirement plans, and freer methods for acquiring goods and services. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is granted to the president of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Section 4 (Section 73.115(d), Education Code) of this bill. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 73.106, Education Code, as follows: Sec. 73.106. PATIENTS. Requires this subchapter to govern the admission of patients to the institution and its substations, the support of patients, and other matters relating to patients, without exception. SECTION 2. Amends Section 73.108(c), Education Code, to authorize, rather than require, the application to be accompanied by a written request for the patient's admission by the patient's attending physician. SECTION 3. Amends Chapter 73C, Education Code, By adding Sections 73.112-73.115, as follows: Sec. 73.112. TREATMENT OF INDIGENT PATIENTS. (a) Authorizes the institution to enter into a contract with a county, public hospital, or a hospital district to provide treatment to residents who are eligible for health care assistance. (b) Prohibits the liability of a county, public hospital, or a hospital district from exceeding the responsibility of a county as provided for in Chapter 61, Health and Safety Code, unless contractually agreed to by the county, public hospital, or hospital district. (c) When entering into a contract pursuant to this section, this provision requires the liability of a county, public hospital or hospital district to take into consideration the actual costs of the institution. (d) In the absence of a contract, this provision requires the institution to receive approval of a county, public hospital or hospital district before providing nonemergency health care services to an eligible resident of the county or service area. Without such approval, the county, public hospital or hospital district is not liable to the institution. (e) Clarifies the definitions of terms used in this section. Sec. 73.113. SUFFICIENCY OF INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS, FEES, AND PATIENT BASE. Requires the institution to ensure that its institutional funds, hospital and clinic fees, and patient base are sufficient to fund and achieve the mission of the institution and protect the state's investment in the institution. Sec. 73.114. INCENTIVE RETIREMENT PLANS. (a) Authorizes the institution to offer incentive retirement plans to employees. (b) Requires incentives to be paid from institutional funds or hospital or clinic fees. (c) Requires any institutional plan for incentive retirement to be filed with the Legislative Budget Board not later than the 61st day before the plan is implemented. (d) Prohibits employees receiving retirement incentives from being rehired unless specifically approved by the president of the institution. Sec. 73.115. ACQUISITION OF GOODS AND SERVICES. (a) Authorizes the institution to acquire goods or services by any method that provides the best value to them. (b) Sets forth factors the institution is required to consider in selecting a vendor. (c) Authorizes the state auditor to audit purchases of goods or services of the institution. (d) Authorizes the institution to adopt necessary or desirable rules and procedures for the acquisition of goods and services. (e) Provides that under conflict, this section prevails over any other law. SECTION 4. Amends Chapter 552B, Health and Safety Code, by adding Section 552.020, as follows: Sec. 552.020. APPLICATION. Provides that this subchapter does not apply to the institution, with an exception. SECTION 5. Provides that this Act takes effect immediately, with the exception of Section 1 and 4 and Section 73.112, Education Code, which take effect September 1, 1995. SECTION 6. Emergency clause. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE The primary differences between the original and substitute bills relate to the treatment of indigent patients as outlined in Section 3 of the bills. The original version allows M.D. Anderson to enter into a contract with a county or a hospital district to provide treatment to eligible residents in those areas. The committee substitute expands the possibility for such contracts to include public hospitals. The substitute also adds three other provisions addressing indigent treatment. Two of the provisions clarify the liability of a county, public hospital, or hospital district to M.D. Anderson if the latter provides health care services to eligible residents. The third provision clarifies definitions used in the section. The substitute also stipulates that M.D. Anderson must adhere to laws governing the purchasing of goods and services as related to contracting with historically underutilized businesses. The original bill gives prevalence to the purchasing and contracting provisions outlined in S.B. 192 if a conflict arises with any other law. The substitute adds the exception for historically underutilized businesses. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION S.B. 192 was considered in a public hearing on February 14, 1995. Testifying for the bill were Leonard Spearman Jr., representing Harris County Judge Robert A. Eckels. No one testified against the bill. Other witnesses testifying on the bill were William H. Cunningham, representing the U.T. System, Charles A. LeMaistre, representing the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and Jim Allison, representing the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas. A motion that the committee substitute S.B. 192 be reported to the House with the recommendation that it do pass was approved with 7 Ayes, 0 Nays, 0 PNV, and 2 Absent.