BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 280 By: Brown Criminal Justice 3-20-95 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has recently overturned several criminal convictions based on technical error or irregularity at the trial court level. The technical errors, in many cases, do not infringe on the substantial rights of the defendant. PURPOSE As proposed, C.S.S.B. 280 prohibits reversing a trial court judgment for an error which does not prejudice the defendant. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Article 44.25, Code of Criminal Procedure, as follows: Art. 44.25. New heading: GROUNDS FOR REVERSAL. (a) Created from existing text. (b) Prohibits the courts of appeals or the Court of Criminal Appeals from reversing a judgment in a criminal action for violation of a constitutional statute, rule, or other law unless the complaining party preserved the complaint for appellate review by complying with the Rule of Appellate Procedure 52 and any other applicable law for preservation of appellate issues. (c) Prohibits the courts of appeals or the Court of Criminal Appeals from reversing a judgment in a criminal action for error of less than a constitutional dimension, including the violation of a statute or court rule, unless the record shows it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict or sentence to the detriment of the appealing party. (d) Prohibits the court of appeals or the Court of Criminal Appeals from reversing a judgment in a criminal action for error of constitutional dimension if the record shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the error made not contribution to the verdict or sentence. SECTION 2. Disapproves Rule 81(b)(2), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 1995. SECTION 4. Emergency clause.