BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 299 By: Ellis (Hill) February 22, 1995 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND Since 1934, the legislature has regularly passed validation statutes that apply to various activities and functions of cities. These statutes validate certain actions taken by cities regarding adoption of home rule charters, and incorporation and annexation proceedings. PURPOSE As proposed, C.S.S.B. 299 validates municipalities' adoption of home-rule charters, incorporation and annexation proceedings, industrial sales tax elections, and all other acts and proceedings; provides that annexation of extraterritorial jurisdiction of another municipality is not validated. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Title 28, V.T.C.S., by adding Article 974d-44, as follows: Art. 974d-44. Sec. 1. APPLICATION. Makes this article applicable to any incorporated city, town, or village operating under general laws or under a home-rule charter. Sec. 2. ADOPTION OR AMENDMENT OF HOME-RULE CHARTER. (a) Provides that all governmental acts and proceedings of a municipality covered by this article regarding the adoption or amendment of a home-rule charter are validated as of the dates on which they occurred. (b) Provides that all proceedings of a municipality since adoption or attempted adoption or amendment of the charter are validated as of the dates on which they occurred. Sec. 3. INCORPORATION PROCEEDINGS. (a) Provides that the incorporation proceedings of all cities and towns are validated as of the date of such incorporation or attempted incorporation. Prohibits the incorporation of such cities and towns from being held invalid because the election or incorporation proceedings may not have been in accordance with the law. (b) Provides that all proceedings performed by the governing bodies of all such cities and towns since their incorporation or attempted incorporation are validated as of the date of such proceedings. Sec. 4. ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS. (a) Provides that proceedings of a city or town relating to annexation of adjacent territory by the city or town, are validated as of the dates they occurred. Prohibits the proceedings from being held invalid because they were not performed in accordance with certain law. Provides that the boundaries fixed by the annexation are validated. (b) Prohibits the proceedings of the city or town occurring after annexation from being held invalid on the ground that the annexation, in the absence of this article, was invalid. Sec. 5. ANNEXATIONS NOT VALIDATED. Provides that this article does not validate governmental proceedings relating to a city's or town's annexation of territory in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of another city or town without the consent of that city or town in violation of Chapters 42 and 43, Local Government Code. Sec. 6 Makes article applicable to acts that occur before March 1, 1995. Sec. 7 ORDINANCE OR REGULATION NOT VALIDATED. Does not validate acts in violation of Sec. 1.06 or 109.57, Alcoholic Beverage Code. SEC. 8 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SALES TAX ELECTION Validates these elections held before January 1, 1995 Sec. 9. EFFECT OF LITIGATION. Makes bill inapplicable to matters in litigation. SECTION 2. Emergency clause. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE The committee substitute adds a new Sec. 6 within Section 1 of the bill which specifically states that this Act applies to governmental acts and proceedings that occurred before March 1, 1995 The substitute changes the operative date in Sec. 8 within Section 1 of the substitute from December 6, 1994 to January 1, 1995 as to industrial development sales tax elections. The substitute deletes December 31, 1994 as the cutoff date for annexation validations in Sec. 4 within Section 1 of the bill. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION S.B. 299 was considered by the committee in a public hearing on February 27, 1995. A substitute was offered by the Chair. The following people testified in favor of the bill: Rep. Gray; and Susan Horton, representing the Texas Municipal League. The bill was left pending. The bill was considered and left pending on March 6, 1995. The bill was considered by the committee and left pending on March 13, 1995 after the following people testified in favor of it: Susan Horton, representing the Texas Municipal League. The committee considered the bill on March 20, 1995. The committee considered a substitute for the bill. The substitute was adopted without objection. The people who testified in favor of the bill: Rep. Gray; Robert Randolph, representing Vinson and Elkins; and Barbara Crews, representing the City of Galveston. The bill was reported favorably, as substituted, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, by a record vote of 7 ayes, 0 nays, 0 pnv, and 2 absent.