BILL ANALYSIS S.B. 900 By: Henderson Jurisprudence 4-12-95 Committee Report (Unamended) BACKGROUND The Texas Family Code requires "best interest" litigation to be as it is in civil cases generally. While excluding evidence of a penal violation in a civil proceeding is generally sound jurisprudence, a statutory exclusion of this type of evidence may prevent a fact finder in a child custody or access dispute from making an informed "best interest" determination. PURPOSE As proposed, S.B. 900 provides that use or nonuse of a child passenger safety seat system or a seat belt is not admissible evidence in a civil trial, other than a proceeding under Title 2A, Family Code. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 107B(f), Article 6701d, V.T.C.S. (Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways), to provide that use or nonuse of a child passenger safety seat system is not admissible evidence in a civil trial, other than a proceeding under Title 2A, Family Code. SECTION 2. Amends Section 107C(j), Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., to provide that use or nonuse of a safety belt is not admissible evidence in a civil trial, other than a proceeding under Title 2A, Family Code. SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 1995. Makes application of this Act prospective. SECTION 4. Emergency clause.