BILL ANALYSIS S.B. 1328 By: Montford (Counts) April 24, 1995 Committee Report (Unamended) BACKGROUND In 1975, the legislature conveyed a 70-acre tract of land located next to the Big Spring State Hospital to the City of Big Spring. Current law provides that the property is to be used for a park or for recreational facilities, and requires the property, if it ever ceases to be used as a park or recreational facility, to revert back to the state under the state's reversionary interest. The City of Big Spring wants the state to release its reversionary interest so that the city can begin to allow the development of the property. After determining that the restriction on the tract was not necessary to protect the delivery of services at the Big Spring State Hospital, the Tx MHMR Board directed the commissioner to seek legislation to authorize the release of the restrictions. The GLO has analyzed the proposal and has recommended releasing the restrictions. PURPOSE As proposed, S.B. 1328 authorizes the General Land Office to release the state's reversionary interest in certain real property located in Howard County. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1 (a) Authorizes the General Land Office to release the state's reversionary interest under Section 2, Chapter 85, Acts of the 64th Legislature, Regular Session, 1975, in the real property conveyed to the City of Big Spring if the city and the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation execute a memorandum of understanding ensuring that future use of the property is compatible with the operation of the Big Spring State Hospital, the city ensures that the portion of the property set aside for public use is accessible to persons with disabilities, and the city pays consideration to the state as determined by the General Land Office. (b) Requires the General Land Office to determine the amount of consideration due by determining the fair market value of the property as if the restrictions under Section 2, Chapter 85, Acts of the 64th Legislature, Regular Session, 1975, did not apply less the fair market value of the property determined as if the restrictions did apply. SECTION 2. Describes the specific territory referred to in SECTION 1. SECTION 3. Emergency clause. Effective upon passage. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION S.B. 1328 was considered by the committee in a formal meeting on April 24, 1995. The bill was reported favorably without amendment, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed and be sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars, by a record vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, 0 pnv, 1 absent.