BILL ANALYSIS S.B. 1369 By: Wentworth (Krusee) April 26, 1995 Committee Report (Unamended) BACKGROUND Certain municipalities having a charter provision allowing for limited purpose annexation, which have annexed territory for a limited purpose, use traffic as a basis on which to limit the development of land that is within and adjacent to a road district and also within a school district and county other than the school district and county in which a majority of the territory of the municipality is located. Municipal regulation limits tax bases and affects county and school district tax revenues. The repayment of the road district's bonds is totally dependent on revenue from development. No other municipality in Texas limits development based on traffic in this way. PURPOSE As proposed, S.B. 1369 prohibits a municipality from regulating, limiting, or delaying land development based on traffic within certain areas in a county. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1 Provides that this Act applies only to a home-rule municipality that has a charter provision allowing for limited-purpose annexation and has annexed territory for a limited purpose. SECTION 2 Defines "affected area," "assessment road district," "state highway." SECTION 3 (a) Prohibits a municipality from denying, limiting, delaying, or conditioning the use or development of land, any part of which is within an affected area, because of: (1) traffic or traffic operations that would result from the proposed use or development of the land; or (2) the effect that the proposed use or development of the land would have on traffic or traffic operations. (b) Provides that an action to deny, limit, delay, or condition the use or development of land includes a decision or action by the governing body of the municipality or a commission, board, department, agency, office, or employee of the municipality related to zoning, subdivision, site planning, the construction or building permit process, or any other municipal process, approval, or permit. (c) Provides that this Act does not prevent a municipality from exercising its authority to require the dedication of right-of-way. SECTION 4 (a) Prohibits a provision in any covenant or agreement relating to land in an affected area made before, on, or after the effective date of this Act that would have the effect of denying, limiting, delaying, or conditioning the use of development of the land because of its effect on traffic or traffic operations from being enforced by a municipality. (b) Provides that this Act controls over any other law relating to municipal regulation of land use or development based on traffic. SECTION 5 Emergency clause. SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION S.B. 1369 was considered by the committee in a public hearing on April 25, 1995. The bill was reported favorably without amendment, with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed, by a record vote of 6 ayes, 0 nays, 0 pnv, 3 absent.