Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction, H.B. 984 By ____________________ H.R. No. ____ 74R14193 CAG-D R E S O L U T I O N 1-1 BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the State 1-2 of Texas, 74th Legislature, Regular Session, 1995, That House Rule 1-3 13, Section 9(a), be suspended in part as provided by House Rule 1-4 13, Section 9(f), to enable the conference committee appointed to 1-5 resolve the differences on House Bill No. 984 to consider and take 1-6 action on the following matters: 1-7 (1) House Rule 13, Section 9(a)(4), is suspended to permit 1-8 the committee to add text in Section 11.11(b), Alcoholic Beverage 1-9 Code, to read as follows: 1-10 (b) A surety bond required under this section shall contain 1-11 the following statements on the face of the bond: 1-12 (1) that the holder of the permit will not violate a 1-13 law of the state relating to alcoholic beverages or a rule of the 1-14 commission; and 1-15 (2) that the holder of the permit agrees that the 1-16 amount of the bond shall be paid to the state if the permit is 1-17 revoked or on final adjudication that the holder violated a 1-18 provision of this code, regardless of whether the actions of an 1-19 employee of a holder are not attributable to the holder under 1-20 Section 106.14. 1-21 Explanation: This change is necessary to clarify the 1-22 requirements for a valid conduct surety bond. 1-23 (2) House Rule 13, Section 9(a)(4), is suspended to permit 1-24 the committee to add text in Section 61.13(b), Alcoholic Beverage 2-1 Code, to read as follows: 2-2 (b) A surety bond required under this section shall contain 2-3 the following statements on the face of the bond: 2-4 (1) that the holder of the license will not violate a 2-5 law of the state relating to alcoholic beverages or a rule of the 2-6 commission; and 2-7 (2) that the holder of the license agrees that the 2-8 amount of the bond shall be paid to the state if the license is 2-9 revoked or on final adjudication that the holder violated a 2-10 provision of this code, regardless of whether the actions of an 2-11 employee of a holder are not attributable to the holder under 2-12 Section 106.14. 2-13 Explanation: This change is necessary to clarify the 2-14 requirements for a valid conduct surety bond. 2-15 ¯BEGCAPTIONÆ 2-16 Suspending limitations on conference committee juridiction, 2-17 H.B. 984. 2-18 ¯ENDCAPTIONÆ