By Madla                                              S.B. No. 1481
       74R8228 CAG-D
                                 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
    1-1                                AN ACT
    1-2  relating to the use of a caterer's permit in a historical brewing
    1-3  compound.
    1-4        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
    1-5        SECTION 1.  Chapter 31, Alcoholic Beverage Code, is amended
    1-6  by adding Section 31.06 to read as follows:
    1-7        Sec. 31.06.  USE OF PERMIT IN HISTORICAL BREWING COMPOUND.
    1-8  (a)  In this section, "historical brewing compound" means an
    1-9  enclosed, restricted-access area in a county with a population of
   1-10  over 1.18 million, which area constitutes a facility operated for
   1-11  the education or entertainment of the public involving the display
   1-12  of recognized historical structures located within the premises of
   1-13  a holder of a manufacturer's permit and related food service and
   1-14  amusement activities.
   1-15        (b)  The authority to use a caterer's permit in a historical
   1-16  brewing compound is limited to the holders of those permits who in
   1-17  their operations under their primary mixed beverage permits do not
   1-18  use the privilege granted by Section 11.49(b)(2) of this code to
   1-19  share premises, employees, business facilities, and services.
   1-20        (c)  Holders of caterer's permits meeting the requirements of
   1-21  Subsection (b) of this section and complying with all other
   1-22  provisions of this section may use their caterer's permits for
   1-23  indefinite periods anywhere in the historical brewing compound even
   1-24  though the ownership of the buildings and grounds on which the
    2-1  permit is to be used may be in an entity that, either directly or
    2-2  by affiliation, has an ownership interest in the holder of a
    2-3  manufacturer's license or a brewer's permit or both; provided,
    2-4  however, that the caterer shall not give any preferential treatment
    2-5  to the brand or brands in which the site owner may have an
    2-6  interest.
    2-7        (d)  For purposes of this section, preferential treatment is
    2-8  any practice by the caterer that, on the basis of information
    2-9  officially reported to the commission, results in sales of
   2-10  beverages identifiable with the site owner made by the caterer in
   2-11  the historical brewing compound during a calendar year that in the
   2-12  aggregate exceed by more than five percent the aggregate percentage
   2-13  share of the same brand or brands sold during the prior calendar
   2-14  year within the county in which the historical brewing compound is
   2-15  located; provided, however, that the computation may exclude sales
   2-16  made on those occasions when a caterer's permit is used to provide
   2-17  service for a private party where specific beverages are ordered
   2-18  and the total charges for those beverages are paid by only one
   2-19  person or entity.
   2-20        (e)  The consideration to be paid by the caterer's permit
   2-21  holder to the owner or operator of the historical brewing compound
   2-22  for the right to sell alcoholic beverages therein may not be made
   2-23  dependent to any degree on the sales volume of any specific brand
   2-24  or brands or on the number of containers of beverages identified
   2-25  with any particular producer.
   2-26        (f)  The wilful sharing of employees, business machines, or
   2-27  services between the holder of the caterer's permit and the owner
    3-1  of the historical brewing compound or any affiliate of the owner is
    3-2  grounds for immediate revocation of the authority of the caterer's
    3-3  permit holder to provide service in the historical brewing
    3-4  compound.
    3-5        (g)  The commission or administrator may suspend for not more
    3-6  than 60 days or cancel the primary mixed beverage permit of any
    3-7  holder of a caterer's permit who violates this section.
    3-8        (h)  If a historical brewing compound owner having, either
    3-9  directly or by affiliation, an ownership interest in the holder of
   3-10  a manufacturer's license or a brewer's permit or both is found to
   3-11  have violated or to have conspired with any other permittee or
   3-12  licensee to violate this section, the commission or administrator
   3-13  may suspend for not more than 60 days the permit or license or both
   3-14  or may revoke the authority of any holder of a caterer's permit to
   3-15  provide service in the historical brewing compound.
   3-16        (i)  Any permittee or licensee whose business or property is
   3-17  injured by a violation of this section may bring suit in any
   3-18  district court in the county in which the violation is alleged to
   3-19  have occurred to require enforcement by injunctive relief or to
   3-20  recover three times the actual damages incurred or for both
   3-21  injunctive relief and treble damages.  The court in its discretion
   3-22  may allow the prevailing party its court costs and reasonable and
   3-23  necessary attorney's fees incurred in the defense or prosecution of
   3-24  such an action.
   3-25        SECTION 2.  The importance of this legislation and the
   3-26  crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
   3-27  emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
    4-1  constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
    4-2  days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended,
    4-3  and that this Act take effect and be in force from and after its
    4-4  passage, and it is so enacted.