By: Montford S.B. No. 1527 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1-1 relating to administrative hearings for the Public Utility 1-2 Commission of Texas provided by the State Office of Administrative 1-3 Hearings. 1-4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-5 SECTION 1. Subchapter C, Chapter 2003, Government Code, is 1-6 amended by adding Section 2003.047 to read as follows: 1-7 Sec. 2003.047. UTILITY DIVISION. (a) The office shall 1-8 establish a utility division to perform the contested case hearings 1-9 for the Public Utility Commission of Texas as prescribed by the 1-10 Public Utility Regulatory Act (Article 1446c, Vernon's Texas Civil 1-11 Statutes) and other applicable law. 1-12 (b) The utility division shall conduct hearings relating to 1-13 contested cases before the commission, other than a hearing 1-14 conducted by one or more commissioners. The commission by rule may 1-15 delegate to the division the responsibility to hear any other 1-16 matter before the commission if consistent with the duties and 1-17 responsibilities of the division. 1-18 (c) Only an administrative law judge in the utility division 1-19 may conduct a hearing on behalf of the commission. An 1-20 administrative law judge in the utility division may conduct 1-21 hearings for other state agencies as time allows. The office may 1-22 transfer an administrative law judge into the division on a 1-23 temporary or permanent basis and may contract with qualified 2-1 individuals to serve as temporary administrative law judges as 2-2 necessary. 2-3 (d) To be eligible to preside at a hearing, an 2-4 administrative law judge, regardless of temporary or permanent 2-5 status, must be licensed to practice law in this state and have not 2-6 less than five years of general experience or three years of 2-7 experience in utility regulatory law. 2-8 (e) At the time the office receives jurisdiction of a 2-9 proceeding, the commission shall provide to the administrative law 2-10 judge a list of issues or areas that must be addressed. In 2-11 addition, the commission may identify and provide to the 2-12 administrative law judge at any time additional issues or areas 2-13 that must be addressed. 2-14 (f) The office and the commission shall jointly adopt rules 2-15 providing for certification to the commission of an issue that 2-16 involves an ultimate finding of compliance with or satisfaction of 2-17 a statutory standard the determination of which is committed to the 2-18 discretion or judgment of the commission by law. The rules must 2-19 address, at a minimum, the issues that are appropriate for 2-20 certification and the procedure to be used in certifying the issue. 2-21 Each agency shall publish the jointly adopted rules. 2-22 (g) Notwithstanding Section 2001.058, the commission may 2-23 change a finding of fact or conclusion of law made by the 2-24 administrative law judge or vacate or modify an order issued by the 2-25 administrative law judge only if the commission: 3-1 (1) determines that the administrative law judge: 3-2 (A) did not properly apply or interpret 3-3 applicable law, agency rules or policies, or prior administrative 3-4 decisions; or 3-5 (B) issued a finding of fact that is not 3-6 supported by a preponderance of the evidence; or 3-7 (2) determines that an agency policy or a prior 3-8 administrative decision on which the administrative law judge 3-9 relied is incorrect or should be changed. 3-10 (h) The commission shall state in writing the specific 3-11 reason and legal basis for its determination under Subsection (g). 3-12 (i) An administrative law judge, on the judge's own motion 3-13 or on motion of a party and after notice and an opportunity for a 3-14 hearing, may impose appropriate sanctions as provided by Subsection 3-15 (j) against a party or its representative for: 3-16 (1) filing a motion or pleading that is groundless and 3-17 brought: 3-18 (A) in bad faith; 3-19 (B) for the purpose of harassment; or 3-20 (C) for any other improper purpose, such as to 3-21 cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of the 3-22 proceeding; 3-23 (2) abuse of the discovery process in seeking, making, 3-24 or resisting discovery; or 3-25 (3) failure to obey an order of the administrative law 4-1 judge or the commission. 4-2 (j) A sanction imposed under Subsection (i) may include, as 4-3 appropriate and justified, issuance of an order: 4-4 (1) disallowing further discovery of any kind or of a 4-5 particular kind by the offending party; 4-6 (2) charging all or any part of the expenses of 4-7 discovery against the offending party or its representatives; 4-8 (3) holding that designated facts be considered 4-9 admitted for purposes of the proceeding; 4-10 (4) refusing to allow the offending party to support 4-11 or oppose a designated claim or defense or prohibiting the party 4-12 from introducing designated matters in evidence; 4-13 (5) disallowing in whole or in part requests for 4-14 relief by the offending party and excluding evidence in support of 4-15 such requests; and 4-16 (6) striking pleadings or testimony, or both, in whole 4-17 or in part. 4-18 SECTION 2. As soon as practicable, the chief administrative 4-19 law judge of the State Office of Administrative Hearings shall 4-20 consult with the director of the hearings division of the Public 4-21 Utility Commission of Texas to assist the judge in: 4-22 (1) determining the number of and requirements for 4-23 administrative law judges needed to conduct Public Utility 4-24 Commission of Texas hearings effectively; and 4-25 (2) making necessary administrative changes in the 5-1 State Office of Administrative Hearings. 5-2 SECTION 3. (a) On September 1, 1995, all personnel, 5-3 including hearings examiners and administrative law judges, 5-4 equipment, data, facilities, and other items of the hearings 5-5 division of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, other than the 5-6 personnel, equipment, data, facilities, and other items of the 5-7 central records office, are transferred to the utility division of 5-8 the State Office of Administrative Hearings. A hearings examiner 5-9 transferred to the State Office of Administrative Hearings becomes 5-10 an administrative law judge on the date of transfer. 5-11 (b) A hearings examiner or administrative law judge 5-12 transferred from the Public Utility Commission of Texas to the 5-13 State Office of Administrative Hearings shall continue to hear any 5-14 case assigned to the person as if the transfer had not occurred. 5-15 SECTION 4. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b) of this 5-16 section, this Act takes effect September 1, 1995. 5-17 (b) Section 2 of this Act takes effect immediately. 5-18 SECTION 5. The importance of this legislation and the 5-19 crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an 5-20 emergency and an imperative public necessity that the 5-21 constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several 5-22 days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended, 5-23 and that this Act take effect and be in force from and after its 5-24 passage, and it is so enacted.