LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 74th Regular Session April 21, 1995 TO: Honorable Allen Place, Chair IN RE: Committee Substitute Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence for House House of Representatives Bill No. 3 Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on House Bill No. 3 (Relating to procedures for applying for a writ of habeas corpus by persons convicted of a felony and procedures for the compensation and appointment of counsel to represent certain persons charged with a capital felony.) this office has determined the following: The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill provides for state habeas corpus review to proceed simultaneously with the direct appeal, limits an inmate who receives the death penalty to one state habeas application, and provides for the appointment of counsel in state habeas review. Costs to the state will be incurred due to the hiring of counsel in the state habeas review, however, a corresponding savings will occur due to the reduction in the amount of time inmates spend on death row. This bill takes effect September 1, 1995, but only if the Comptroller certifies on or before that date that at least $5,000,000 is appropriated by the General Appropriations Act, Acts of the 74th Legislature, Regular Session, 1995, for the fiscal biennium ending August 31, 1997, to the court of criminal appeals for the purpose of providing compensation and expense to counsel representing persons under a sentence of death in habeas corpus proceedings. The probable fiscal implication of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Fiscal Probable Year Cost/(Savings) to General Revenue Fund 001 1996 $1,204,750 1997 (1,875,250) 1998 (2,645,250) 1999 (2,205,250) 2000 (1,765,250) Source: Office of the Attorney General, Court of Criminal Appeals LBB Staff: JK, BR, RR