LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 74th Regular Session April 9, 1995 TO: Honorable Curtis Seidlits, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1718 Committee on State Affairs By: Turner, House of Representatives Sylvester Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on House Bill No. 1718 (Relating to the revision of the open records law.) this office has determined the following: The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill would change the term "open records" to "public information" and expand the definition of public information. The bill would require state agencies to deposit funds received from public information requests into an unobligated account in the general revenue fund. Out of this account, the Comptroller could transfer twenty-five percent of amounts collected for providing mailing lists and fifteen percent of amounts collected for providing copies of other public records to the general revenue fund. The Comptroller would be required to develop rules for this provision. The bill would require the General Services Commission to adopt rules for determining charges for providing information. Governmental bodies would be required to use the rules, unless exempted by the Commission or other law provides charges for specific information. The General Services Commission would be required to publish an annual list in the Texas Register of governmental bodies who are exempted from charging the rates established by the Commission. The bill would require that charges for public information not be excessive and not exceed actual costs of providing the information. The bill would require the General Services Commission to receive and review complaints from persons believing that they have been overcharged. The Commission could request information of governmental bodies regarding the complaint, determine appropriate charges and require that the governmental body adjust its charges, if necessary. The bill would allow lawsuits to be filed under specific circumstances and require that the state pay the costs of litigation, and reasonable attorney fees if the requestor substantially prevailed in the lawsuit. The act would be effective September 1, 1995. The fiscal implication to the State or units of local government cannot be determined. Source: General Services Commission, Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK, MS, DF