LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 74th Regular Session March 15, 1995 TO: Honorable Debra Danburg, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1859 Committee on Elections By: Danburg House of Representatives Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on House Bill No. 1859 (relating to the form of the ballot and related procedures in connection with certain voters voting on an affidavit; providing criminal penalties) this office has determined the following: The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill would set up new procedures for voting by "challenge affidavit." The current procedure allows persons who are challenged about their voter eligibility to vote after executing an affidavit certifying that they are eligible to vote. The bill would require that the ballot of such a voter include a detachable stub which the voter would sign and deposit in a separate ballot stub box at the polling place. The Secretary of State would be responsible for determining the number of ballots with stubs to be provided to polling places. Local governments would be required to print separate stub ballots for challenged voters and would be required to purchase additional ballot boxes for the deposit of challenged ballots. During primary election years, the additional cost to the State for the stub challenge ballots would be approximately $169,995. This cost is based on an assumption that placing a stub on the ballot would be a ballot format change which would cost about $15 per precinct for each of the state's 11,333 voting precincts. The probable fiscal implication of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Fiscal Probable Cost Out Year of General Revenue Fund 001 1996 $169,995 1997 0 1998 169,995 1999 0 2000 169,995 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. The fiscal implication to units of local government cannot be determined. Source: Secretary of State LBB Staff: JK, JC, RR