LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 74th Regular Session April 12, 1995 TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2572 Committee on Juvenile Justice and By: Brady Family Issues House of Representatives Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on House Bill No. 2572 (relating to the foster care of certain children and the termination of the parent-child relationship) this office has determined the following: This bill would permit judicial termination of the parent-child relationship if the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services has been the child's permanent managing conservator for at least 12 months and has placed the child in foster care, a group home, or an institution; the parent has failed to substantially plan for, provide for, or maintain more than incidental contact with the child, or has neglected, abused, or failed to care for another child; and termination is in the best interest of the child. The bill is based on a Texas Performance Review recommendation (GG11) that the Legislature should amend the family code to allow termination of parental rights one year after a child is removed from the home if the parent has refused to follow court orders. The recommendation anticipates a savings to the State by reducing foster care costs for children who have no hope of reuniting with their parents. General revenue savings are based on the Comptroller of Public Account's TPR recommendation. The Department of Protective and Regulatory Services indicates the general revenue savings to be $740,744 for the FY 1996-97 biennium due to a more favorable federal matching ratio for foster care payments. The probable fiscal implication of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Fiscal Probable Savings Year to General Revenue Fund 001 1996 $541,000 1997 541,000 1998 541,000 1999 541,000 2000 541,000 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Department of Protective and Regulatory Services LBB Staff: JK, NM, RR