LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 74th Regular Session May 25, 1995 TO: Honorable Judith Zaffirini, Chair IN RE: Committee Substitute Committee on Health & Human Services forHouse Bill Senate No. 2644 Austin, Texas By: Hilderbran FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on House Bill No. 2644 (relating to licensing and Medicaid certification requirements for certain nursing facilities and related penalties and dispute resolution) this office has determined the following: The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill provides for the Department of Human Services to implement rules that "except to the extent necessary to implement rights granted to an elderly individual under Chapter 102, ... may not be different from the standards imposed by federal law." In addition, the bill applies to any dispute between an institution licensed under Chapter 242, Health and Safety Code, and the Department of Human Services relating to: * renewal of a license under Section 242.003; * suspension or revocation of a license or closing of a license under Section 242.061; * assessment of a civil penalty under Section 242.065; * assessment of a monetary penalty under Section 242.066; or * assessment of a penalty as described by Section 31.021(k), Human Resources Code. The bill also provides for an affected institution to select binding arbitration as an alternative to contested case hearing or judicial proceeding relating to the assessment of a civil penalty. The department shall pay the cost of the arbitration if the department elects the arbitration. If the institution elects the arbitration, the cost of the arbitration shall be equally shared by the Department of Human Services and the institution electing arbitration. The arbitration rules are to be adopted by the chief administrative law judge of the State Office of Administrative Hearings and arbitration proceedings are to be conducted in accordance with the adopted rules. The provisions of the bill take effect September 1, 1995 and applies only to a dispute described by Section 242.251, Health and Safety Code, as added by this Act, with respect to which formal proceedings are commenced on or after January 1, 1996. The Department of Human Services (DHS) has assumed that approximately 99 institutions will choose arbitration as an alternative to contested case hearing or judicial proceeding relating to the assessment of a civil penalty for FY 96 and FY 97, 100 institutions in FY 98, FY 99, and Fiscal Year 2000. DHS has also assumed that the travel and operating costs per arbitration would be $991.00. The incremental increases in the cost of arbitration are consistent with that of the increase in licensed nursing and personal care institutions. The State Office of Administrative Hearings' fiscal impact is based upon the estimated number of cases, as identified by DHS to referred for arbitration. The probable fiscal implication of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Fiscal Probable Cost Out Probable Cost Out Probable Cost Out Year of General of GR Match For of Federal Funds Revenue Fund 001 Medicaid 555 1996 $19,715 $49,054 $49,054 1997 15,851 49,054 49,054 1998 15,851 49,550 49,550 1999 15,851 49,550 49,550 2000 15,851 49,550 49,550 Fiscal Change in Year Number of State Employees from FY 1995 1996 .0 1997 .0 1998 .0 1999 .0 2000 .0 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Department of Human Services LBB Staff: JK, MU, DF