LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
74th Regular Session
April 26, 1995
TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair IN RE: Committee Substitute
Committee on Juvenile Justice and for
Family Issues House Bill
House of Representatives No. 2664
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on House Bill No.
2664 (relating to the enforcement of certain child support and
medical support obligations) this office has determined the
following:
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The bill would add or amend several sections of the Human
Resources Code and would direct the Office of the Attorney
General (AG) to establish a unified registry and enforcement
system for child support and medical support enforcement in
coordination with the Texas Judicial Council, the Office of Court
Administration, and federal, state, and local officials. The
system would allow counties to voluntarily become part of the
Title IV-D child support system, using existing or new county
expenditures for child support enforcement. The new system would
include a child support registry and an automated enforcement
process. The AG would be directed to convene a work group to
develop a timetable for implementation of the registry. As a
condition of participation, counties electing to participate
would have to contract with the AG to comply with relevant
federal law. Implementation would be contingent on receipt of
local funds and federal reimbursements.
The bill would require the AG to establish support obligations in
child support cases involving children receiving Aid to Families
with Dependent Children (AFDC) within one year to the extent
possible. Other private entities, along with private attorneys
and political subdivisions would be allowed to provide services
in Title IV-D cases. The bill would remove language relating to
reimbursements for sheriffs or constables traveling out of county
to execute an outstanding warrant or capias and would allow the
AG to pay for reasonable travel costs for sheriffs or constables
traveling out of county.
The bill would expand and simplify the voluntary Employer New
Hire Reporting (ENHR) program to include the development of an
automated reporting system to be shared by the Department of
Human Services, the Workers' Compensation Commission, and the
Texas Employment Commission, to increase child and medical
support and decrease fraud. Employers would be encouraged to
report information, and cooperation with several state agencies
would be required. Information for distribution of promotional
literature is detailed. The bill would require the AG and the
Department of Human Services (DHS) to improve information
collection in the AFDC and Child Support programs. The agencies
would be required to adopt a memorandum of understanding relating
to establishing child support for children eligible for AFDC, and
requiring the AG and DHS to develop procedures to obtain
information from eligibility workers.
The bill would encourage the Attorney General to maximize the
collection of medical support and establish cash medical support
orders for children eligible for medical assistance under the
state Medicaid program, who are not covered by private insurance.
The bill would change general provisions related to child support
review and would allow courts to compel compliance with an
administrative subpoena issued by the agency. The review would
be redefined as a process to resolve routine child support issues
by agreement rather than by a negotiation process. The bill
would include a new process for parentage testing. A study would
be required of the comparative advantages of the child support
review process versus other enforcement techniques. The Texas
Judicial Council would be required to implement a monthly
tracking system to gather information on child and medical
support, and district and county clerks would be required to
report information.
The bill would require the AG to create an interagency working
group on child support enforcement and would require a report to
the Governor, Comptroller of Public Accounts, and the Legislature
not later than September 1, 1996, relating to progress toward
implementation of the integrated child support system. DHS
would be required to pay a cash incentive to the AG for Medicaid
cases enrolled in medical insurance by AG enforcement action, and
a report to the Legislature would be required not later October
1, 1996. A study on the feasibility of a health purchasing
alliance by the AG, the state Medicaid administrator, and the
Insurance Commission would be required to be prepared by October
1, 1996. The AG would be strongly encouraged to expand the cost-
effective use of private contractors and would be directed to
perform a cost analysis such as the one used by the Council on
Competitive Government.
The bill would require the AG to produce a report on costs and
savings associated with the expansion of privatization of child
support enforcement by December 1, 1996. The AG and DHS would be
required to develop and implement a plan to have child support
officers work with DHS eligibility workers.
The bill also adds several sections to the Insurance Code and
amends various provisions in the Family Code which are at
variance with federal regulations.
The Office of Attorney General has identified 77 Full Time
Equivalent Employees and a biennial cost of $6,699,656 to
implement the provisions of the bill. The amounts indicated
below are based on Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates and
do not include Office of the Attorney General costs as a
requirement of implementation.
The probable fiscal implication of implementing the provisions of
the bill during each of the first five years following passage
is estimated as follows:
Fiscal Probable Revenue Probable Revenue Probable Cost Out
Year Gain to Gain to Child of Child Support
General Revenue Support Retained Retained
Fund 001 Collections Collections
Account 787 Account 787
1996 $4,100,000 $994,000 $48,000
1997 4,600,000 3,288,000 96,000
1998 5,000,000 3,388,000 96,000
1999 5,500,000 3,588,000 96,000
2000 6,100,000 3,788,000 96,000
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the
provisions of the bill are in effect.
The fiscal implication to units of local government cannot be
determined.
Source: Office of the Attorney General, Comptroller of Public
Accounts
LBB Staff: JK, JC, RR