LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
74th Regular Session
April 23, 1995
TO: Honorable Ken Armbrister, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No.
Committee on State Affairs 1391,
Senate as amended
Austin, Texas By: Ellis
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on Senate Bill No.
1391 (Relating to records and seals of notaries public and to
qualification as a notary public.) this office has determined the
following:
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The bill would streamline the procedure for commissioning a
notary public by consolidating the current two-step procedure for
qualification into one step. In addition, the same application
form would be used for obtaining both new and renewal
commissions. The form would contain all the elements necessary
for qualification as a notary public.
The bill would eliminate the requirement for the Secretary of
State to mail an application for reappointment to notaries whose
commissions are expiring. It also increases the amount of the
notary bond from $2,500.00 to $10,000.00. The bill would provide
for the use of existing stocks of notary commissions when either
the Governor or the Secretary of State ceases to hold or perform
the duties of office.
The savings to general revenue is based on the estimated savings
for printing and postage costs that will result from combining
the commissioning procedure into a one-step process and from
eliminating the mailing of renewal notices.
The probable fiscal implication of implementing the provisions of
the bill during each of the first five years following passage
is estimated as follows, per estimate of the Office of Secretary
of State:
Fiscal Probable Savings Change in
Year to General Number of State
Revenue Fund 001 Employees from
FY 1995
1996 $48,624 .0
1997 56,244 .0
1998 43,644 .0
1999 41,544 .0
2000 52,044 .0
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the
provisions of the bill are in effect.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is
anticipated.
Source: Secretary of State
LBB Staff: JK, BR, RR