ACM H.B. 837 75(R)BILL ANALYSIS CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE H.B. 837 By: West, George "Buddy" 5-1-97 Committee Report (Amended) BACKGROUND Article 47.02, Code of Criminal Procedure, details the procedure to be followed, with criminal action pending, for the disposition of property which a law enforcement officer has seized believing it is stolen. Under the current law, a district judge, county judge, statutory county judge, justice of the peace, or municipal judge may, as magistrate, conduct a hearing to determine who has superior right to possession of the property. The present language, however, provides that the action must be done by the judge who has jurisdiction over the criminal case. Considering the large caseloads of these judges, this requirement often delays the return of the property and adds to the duties they already have. PURPOSE HB 837, as proposed, would allow the court in which the trial is pending to authorize any magistrate to hold the property disposition hearing described in 47.02 and, upon decision and using the same satisfying test of proof, restore the property to the rightful owner. Appropriate allowances are made to ensure property availability for purposes of prosecution. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency or institution. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Article 47.02, Code of Criminal Procedure, by creating new subsection (c) which provides that the court in which the trial is pending may authorize a magistrate to hold a hearing to determine the true owner of the property and that the magistrate may direct the peace officer to restore the property to the owner subject to a requirement that the person make the property available to the attorney representing the state if necessary for prosecution purposes. SECTION 2. Effective date: September 1, 1997. SECTION 3. Emergency Clause. EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS The committee amendment provides that the owner of the property is subject to a requirement that the person make the property available to the court if necessary for evidentiary purposes.