JLM C.S.S.B. 294 75(R)    BILL ANALYSIS


PUBLIC EDUCATION
C.S.S.B. 294
By: Sibley (Maxey)
5-20-97
Committee Report (Substituted)



BACKGROUND 

Textbooks are approved for purchase with state funds through a screening
process that was modified by Senate Bill 1 in 1995.  The latest Texas
Performance Review (TPR) report, Disturbing the Peace, notes that adoption
reviews for most textbooks take place every 6-10 years, and many textbooks
in current use contain outdated, inaccurate information. 

According to current standard contracts between Texas Education Agency
(TEA) and textbook publishers, the State Board of Education (SBOE) can
seek no more than one revision every two years between adoptions, and they
must give a publisher one-year advance notice.  TEA pays for these
updates.  

Ideally, updates for textbooks would be obtained in a timely manner at a
low cost.  The Internet is a relatively accessible and highly efficient
tool for gathering timely information.  This technology could readily
support timely updates to current textbooks.  

Currently, the education code includes a definition of "electronic
textbooks" as "any mean(s) of conveying information to the student or
otherwise contributing to the learning process through electronic means."
The definition of publisher includes "an on-line service or ad developer
or distributor of an electronic textbook."  These features of current law
were intended to facilitate the use of electronic media and its capacity
for information dissemination.  The committee substitute for this bill
incorporates the needs of students who are blind or visually disabled in
the study directed by the commissioner. 

This legislation has great potential to impact the quality of information
received by Texas school children by insuring not only that textbooks are
up-to-date, but also that teachers are motivated to take advantage of the
vast resources of information available on the Internet. 

PURPOSE

To develop an advisory committee to study the costs and benefits of using
computer networks, specifically addressing the update of textbooks via the
Internet.  A subcommittee would be appointed to investigate and report on
the use of technology to provide textbooks to students who are blind,
visually impaired, or have other disabilities.  The advisory committee
would coordinate with the SBOE's long-range technology plan and provide
its recommendations to the 76th Legislature not later than February 1,
1999. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any
additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency or
institution. 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1.  Subchapter B, Chapter 32 of the Education Code is amended by
adding: 

Section 32.037 -Computer Network Study Project
(a) Directs the agency to develop a study project to determine the costs
and  benefits of using computer networks, including the Internet, in
public schools. 
(b) Describes purpose of committee and who will serve:
(1) Requires formation of a committee to assist agency in the study that
must include the possibility of delivering textbook updates via computer
network. 
(2) Directs commissioner to appoint an advisory committee composed of
agency personnel, textbook publishers, educators, students, and technology
experts. 
(3) Directs presiding officers of the legislature to each appoint two
members to the committee.   
(c) Prescribes that the study must:
(1) Use a group of school districts selected to provide a sample that is
geographic, demographic, and economically balanced. 
(2) Be designed to yield results that are applicable statewide
(3) Be coordinated with the SBOEs long-range technology plan, including
standards for computer literacy under Section 32.001(a)(3). 
(d) Directs the commissioner to appoint a subcommittee to investigate the
feasibility and cost-effectiveness of developing electronic textbooks for
use by students with who are blind or have disabilities. 
  (e) Directs the agency to report the results of the study project to the
76th     Legislature not later than February 1, 1999. 
(f) This section expires September 1, 1999.

Section 2.  Emergency clause.  Effect date: upon passage.

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

SECTION 1.  Clarifies language regarding the purpose of the committee in
Sec. 32.037(a). 

SECTION 2.  The committee substitute incorporates language that addresses
the needs of students who are blind or visually impaired in Sec.
32.037(d).