SRC-CDH S.B. 1120 75(R)   BILL ANALYSIS


Senate Research Center   S.B. 1120
By: Armbrister
Criminal Justice
4-8-97
As Filed


DIGEST 

Currently, the federal legislation cited as the "Communications Assistance
for Law Enforcement Act of 1994" necessitates changes in Articles 18.20
and 18.21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 16.02 through
16.05 of the Penal Code.  Moreover, the enactment of S.B. 1067 of the 73rd
Legislative Session produced a need for clarification and modification of
the same statutes.  There is also a need for some flexibility in certain
cases to shift the appropriate court or prosecutor to be approached in
cases involving potential official misconduct or technological confusion.

This legislation makes Articles 18.20 and 18.21 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure and Chapter 16 of the Penal Code conform with Title 18 of the
United States Code.  The definitions of "wire communication" and
"electronic communication" would now include the radio portion of a
cordless telephone, while the definitions of "pen register" and "readily
accessible to the general public," as well as other matters, would track
earlier changes made in federal law.  This bill would remove nine
definitions in Article 18.21 and cross-reference them to their
counterparts in Article 18.20; remove procedural matters from the Penal
Code and move them to the Code of Criminal Procedure; and bring the
defensive issues in Chapter 16 of the Penal Code in line with the new 1994
Penal Code. In addition, S.B. 1120 would clarify the particular court or
prosecutor who could, given the proper cause, act in the area of wiretaps.

PURPOSE

As proposed, S.B. 1120 establishes provisions regarding the interception
of wire, oral, or electronic communications, the use of pen registers and
trap and trace devices, and the civil and criminal consequences of
improperly engaging in those activities. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

This bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, institution, or agency. 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

SECTION 1. Amends Subdivisions (1), (8), (14), (15), and (19), Section 1,
Article 18.20, Code of Criminal Procedure, to redefine "wire
communication," "prosecutor," "pen register," "electronic communication,"
and "readily accessible to the general public."   

SECTION 2. Amends Section 3(b), Article 18.20, Code of Criminal Procedure,
to authorize a judge appointed under Subsection (a), except as provided by
Subsection (c), to act on an application for authorization to intercept
wire, oral, or electronic communications if the judge is appointed as the
judge of competent jurisdiction within certain administrative judicial
districts, rather than authorizing only the judge of competent
jurisdiction for the administrative judicial district in which the
proposed interception will be made to act on an application to intercept
certain communications. 

SECTION 3. Amends Section 16, Article 18.20, Code of Criminal Procedure,
to provide that a person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is
intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this article, or in
violation of Chapter 16, Penal Code, has a civil cause of action against
any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses or solicits, rather than
procures, another person to do the same, and is entitled to recover from
the person certain damages and costs incurred.  Establishes that a good
faith reliance on a court order or legislative authorization constitutes a
complete defense to  an action, rather than any civil or criminal action,
brought under this section, rather than article.  Sets forth the terms
under which a person is subject to suit by the federal or state government
for appropriate injunctive relief if the person engages in conduct that
constitutes an offense under Section 16.05, Penal Code, and involves
certain radio communications.  Provides that a defendant is liable for a
civil penalty of $500 if it is shown at the trial that the defendant has
been convicted of an offense under Section 16.05, Penal Code, or is found
liable in a civil action brought under Subsection (a).  Establishes that
each violation of an injunction ordered under Subsection (c) is punishable
by a fine of $500.  Sets forth the attorneys authorized to file suit under
Subsection (c) on behalf of the state.   

SECTION 4. Amends Section 17, Article 18.20, Code of Criminal Procedure,
as follows: 

Sec. 17.  New heading:  NONAPPLICABILITY.  Provides that this article does
not apply to conduct described as an affirmative defense under Section
16.02(c), Penal Code, rather than Section 16.02(c)(5), Penal Code.
Deletes the existing section regarding exceptions. 

SECTION 5. Amends Section 1, Article 18.21, Code of Criminal Procedure, to
redefine "aural transfer," "communication common carrier," "electronic
communication," "electronic communications service," "electronic
communications system," "electronic storage," "pen register," "readily
accessible to the general public," "trap and trace device," "user," and
"wire communication." Makes conforming changes. 

SECTION 6. Amends Section 2(f), Article 18.21, Code of Criminal Procedure,
to provide that an order for the installation and utilization of a pen
register or trap and trace device is valid for not more than 60, rather
than 30, days after the date the device is installed or after 10 days
after the date the order is entered, whichever occurs first, with certain
exceptions.  Prohibits the period of extension from exceeding 60, rather
than 30, days for each extension granted, except in certain cases.   

SECTION 7. Amends Section 3, Article 18.21, Code of Criminal Procedure, to
delete the provision authorizing an authorized peace officer, designated
by the director of the Department of Public Safety, to install and use a
pen register or trap and trace device in certain circumstances.  Requires
an officer, if authorization is not obtained within 48 hours after the
installation begins, to terminate use of the pen register or the trap and
trace device on the expiration of the 48 hours or at the time the order is
denied, whichever is earlier.  Deletes the previous provisions regarding
termination of the pen register or the trap and trace device, and the
knowing installation or use by an authorized peace officer of either
instruments.  Prohibits the state from using as evidence in a, rather than
any subsequent, criminal proceeding any information gained through the use
of a pen register or trap and trace device installed, rather than issued,
under this section if authorization is denied.  Makes conforming changes. 

SECTION 8. Amends Article 18.21, Code of Criminal Procedure, by adding
Section 16, as follows: 

Sec. 16.  LIMITATION.  Requires a governmental agency authorized to
install and use a pen register under this article or other law to use
reasonably available technology to only record and decode electronic or
other impulses used to identify the numbers dialed or otherwise
transmitted. 

SECTION 9. Amends Sections 16.02(c), Penal Code, to provide that it is an
affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (b) that a person
acting under color of law intercepts a wire, oral, or electronic
communication if oral or written, rather than prior, consent for the
interception is given by a magistrate before the interception; or a person
intercepts radio communication, other than a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between a cordless telephone handset and
a base unit that is transmitted by certain means.   

SECTION 10. Amends Section 16.03(a) and (c)-(e), Penal Code, to provide
that a person commits an offense if the person knowingly installs or uses
a pen register or trap and trace device to record or decode electronic or
other impulses for the purpose of identifying telephone numbers dialed or
otherwise transmitted on a telephone line, rather than utilizing such
instruments to record telephone numbers dialed from or to a telephone
instrument.  Sets forth the terms under which it is an  affirmative
defense to prosecution under, rather than an exception to the application
of, Subsection (a), that certain conditions exist.  Makes conforming
changes. 

SECTION 11. Amends Section 16.04(e), Penal Code, to set forth the terms
under which it is an affirmative defense to prosecution under, rather than
an exception to the application of, Subsection (b), that the conduct was
authorized by certain persons. 

SECTION 12. Amends Sections 16.05(b)-(e), Penal Code, to provide that a
person who provides electronic communications service to the public
commits an offense if the person knowingly divulges the contents of a
communication to another who is not the intended recipient of the
communication.  Deletes the previous provisions regarding the offense of
intentionally divulging the contents of a communication to any person
other than the addressee, the intended recipient, or the addressee's or
intended recipient's agent.  Sets forth the terms under which it is an
affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (b) that the actor
divulged the contents of the communication in a certain manner.  Deletes
the provision authorizing a person who provides electronic communications
service to the public to divulge the contents in a certain manner.
Establishes that except as provided by Subsection (e), an offense under
Subsection (b) that involves a scrambled or encrypted radio communication
is a state jail felony, rather than establishing that except as provided
by Subsections (e) and (f), an offense under Subsection (b) is a state
jail felony. Deletes text regarding an offense involving the radio portion
of a cellular telephone communication. 

SECTION 13. Repealer:  Section 16.05(f), Penal Code (regarding injunctive
relief and civil penalties for certain illegal divulgence of public
communications). 

SECTION 14. Effective date:  September 1, 1997.

SECTION 15. Makes application of this Act prospective regarding SECTIONS
8-11 and 13. 

SECTION 16. Emergency clause.