By Chisum                                             H.B. No. 3459
                                A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 1-1                                   AN ACT
 1-2     relating to environmental and health and safety audits; providing a
 1-3     penalty.
 1-4           BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 1-5           SECTION 1.  Section 5(b), Texas Environmental, Health, and
 1-6     Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article 4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil
 1-7     Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
 1-8           (b)  Except as provided in Sections 6, 7, and 8[, and 9] of
 1-9     this Act, any part of an audit report is privileged and is not
1-10     admissible as evidence or subject to discovery in:
1-11                 (1)  a civil action, whether legal or equitable; or
1-12                 (2)  [a criminal proceeding; or]
1-13                 [(3)]  an administrative proceeding.
1-14           SECTION 2.  Section 6, Texas Environmental, Health, and
1-15     Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article 4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil
1-16     Statutes), is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding
1-17     Subsection (e) to read as follows:
1-18           (b)  Disclosure of an audit report or any information
1-19     generated by an environmental or health and safety audit does not
1-20     waive the privilege established by Section 5 of this Act if the
1-21     disclosure:
1-22                 (1)  is made to address or correct a matter raised by
1-23     the environmental or health and safety audit and is made only to:
1-24                       (A)  a person employed by the owner or operator,
 2-1     including temporary and contract employees;
 2-2                       (B)  a legal representative of the owner or
 2-3     operator;
 2-4                       (C)  an officer or director of the regulated
 2-5     facility or operation or a partner of the owner or operator; or
 2-6                       (D)  an independent contractor retained by the
 2-7     owner or operator;
 2-8                 (2)  is made under the terms of a confidentiality
 2-9     agreement between the person for whom the audit report was prepared
2-10     or the owner or operator of the audited facility or operation and:
2-11                       (A)  a partner or potential partner of the owner
2-12     or operator of the facility or operation;
2-13                       (B)  a transferee or potential transferee of the
2-14     facility or operation;
2-15                       (C)  a lender or potential lender for the
2-16     facility or operation;
2-17                       (D)  a governmental official of [or] a state [or
2-18     federal agency]; or
2-19                       (E)  a person or entity engaged in the business
2-20     of insuring, underwriting, or indemnifying the facility or
2-21     operation; or
2-22                 (3)  is made under a claim of confidentiality to a
2-23     governmental official or agency by the person for whom the audit
2-24     report was prepared or by the owner or operator.
2-25           (e)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to circumvent
2-26     the protections provided by federal or state law for individuals
2-27     that disclose information to law enforcement authorities.
 3-1           SECTION 3.  Section 6(d), Texas Environmental, Health, and
 3-2     Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article 4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil
 3-3     Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
 3-4           (d)  Information that is disclosed under Subsection (b)(3) of
 3-5     this section is confidential and is not subject to disclosure under
 3-6     Chapter 552, Government Code.  A public entity, public employee, or
 3-7     public official who discloses information in violation of this
 3-8     subsection is subject to any penalty provided in Chapter 552,
 3-9     Government Code [commits an offense.  An offense under this
3-10     subsection is a Class B misdemeanor].  It is an affirmative defense
3-11     to the clerical dissemination of a privileged audit report that the
3-12     report was not clearly labeled "COMPLIANCE REPORT:  PRIVILEGED
3-13     DOCUMENT" or words of similar import.  The lack of labeling may not
3-14     be raised as a defense if the entity, employee, or official knew or
3-15     had reason to know that the document was a privileged audit report.
3-16           SECTION 4.  Section 7(d), Texas Environmental, Health, and
3-17     Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article 4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil
3-18     Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
3-19           (d)  A person claiming the privilege is subject to sanctions
3-20     as provided by Rule 215 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure or to
3-21     a fine not to exceed $10,000 if the court finds, consistent with
3-22     fundamental due process, that the person intentionally or knowingly
3-23     claimed the privilege for unprotected information as provided in
3-24     Section 8 of this Act.
3-25           SECTION 5.  Section 7(a), Texas Environmental, Health, and
3-26     Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article 4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil
3-27     Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
 4-1           (a)  A court or administrative hearings official with
 4-2     competent jurisdiction may require disclosure of a portion of an
 4-3     audit report in a civil[, criminal,] or administrative proceeding
 4-4     if the court or administrative hearings official determines, after
 4-5     an in camera review consistent with the appropriate rules of
 4-6     procedure, that:
 4-7                 (1)  the privilege is asserted for a fraudulent
 4-8     purpose;
 4-9                 (2)  the portion of the audit report is not subject to
4-10     the privilege under Section 8 of this Act; or
4-11                 (3)  the portion of the audit report shows evidence of
4-12     noncompliance with an environmental or health and safety law and
4-13     appropriate efforts to achieve compliance with the law were not
4-14     promptly initiated and pursued with reasonable diligence after
4-15     discovery of noncompliance.
4-16           SECTION 6.  Section 9, Texas Environmental, Health, and
4-17     Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article 4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil
4-18     Statutes), is amended to read as follows:
4-19           Sec. 9.  [Court] Review OF PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS BY
4-20     GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY [and Disclosure].  (a)  Where an audit
4-21     report is obtained, reviewed, or used in a criminal proceeding, the
4-22     administrative or civil evidentiary privilege created by this Act
4-23     is not waived or eliminated for any other purpose [If there is
4-24     reasonable cause to believe a criminal offense has been committed
4-25     under an environmental or health and safety law, the attorney
4-26     representing the state may obtain an audit report for which a
4-27     privilege is asserted under this Act under a search warrant,
 5-1     criminal subpoena, or discovery as allowed by the Code of Criminal
 5-2     Procedure and the Texas Rules of Criminal Procedure].
 5-3           (b)  Notwithstanding the privilege established under this
 5-4     Act, a regulatory agency may review information that is required to
 5-5     be available under a specific state or federal law, but such review
 5-6     does not waive or eliminate the administrative or civil evidentiary
 5-7     privilege where applicable [On receipt of the audit report, the
 5-8     attorney representing the state shall seal the report and may not
 5-9     review or disclose the contents of the report].
5-10           (c)  If information is required to be available to the public
5-11     by operation of a specific state or federal law, the governmental
5-12     authority shall notify the person claiming the privilege of the
5-13     potential for public disclosure prior to obtaining such information
5-14     under Subsection (a) or (b) [Not later than the 30th day after the
5-15     date an audit report is received under Subsection (a), the owner or
5-16     operator who prepared the report or for whom the report was
5-17     prepared may file with a court of competent jurisdiction a petition
5-18     requesting an in camera review to determine whether all or a
5-19     portion of the report is privileged or is subject to disclosure
5-20     under this Act.  An owner or operator who fails to file a petition
5-21     under this subsection within the period specified by this
5-22     subsection waives the privilege].
5-23           (d)  If privileged information is disclosed under Subsection
5-24     (b) or (c), on [On the filing of a petition under Subsection (c) of
5-25     this section, the court shall issue an order that:]
5-26                 [(1)  schedules the in camera review for a date not
5-27     later than the 45th day after the date the petition is filed; and]
 6-1                 [(2)  authorizes the attorney representing the state to
 6-2     remove the seal from the report to review the report, subject to
 6-3     appropriate limitations on distribution or disclosure of the report
 6-4     that are specified in the order to protect against unnecessary
 6-5     disclosure.]
 6-6           [(e)  The attorney representing the state may consult with
 6-7     enforcement agencies regarding the contents of the report as
 6-8     necessary to prepare for the in camera review.]
 6-9           [(f)  Information used in preparation for the in camera
6-10     review under Subsection (e) of this section:]
6-11                 [(1)  is confidential;]
6-12                 [(2)  may not be used in any investigation or legal
6-13     proceeding; and]
6-14                 [(3)  is not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552,
6-15     Government Code.]
6-16           [(g)  Subsection (f) of this section does not apply to
6-17     information a court finds to be subject to disclosure.]
6-18           [(h)  On] the motion of a party, a court or the  appropriate
6-19     administrative official shall suppress evidence offered in any
6-20     civil[, criminal,] or administrative proceeding that arises or is
6-21     derived from review, disclosure, or use of information obtained
6-22     under this section if the review, disclosure, or use is not
6-23     authorized under Section 8 [this section].  A party having received
6-24     information under Subsection (b) or (c) [allegedly failing to
6-25     comply with this section] has the burden of proving that the
6-26     evidence offered did not arise and was not derived from the
6-27     [unauthorized] review of privileged information[, disclosure, or
 7-1     use].
 7-2           [(i)  The parties may stipulate to entry of an order
 7-3     directing that specific information contained in an audit report is
 7-4     or is not subject to the privilege.]
 7-5           [(j)  A court may compel the disclosure of only those
 7-6     portions of an audit report relevant to issues in dispute in the
 7-7     proceeding.]
 7-8           [(k)  A court may find a person who discloses information in
 7-9     violation of this section in contempt of court and may order other
7-10     appropriate relief.]
7-11           SECTION 7.  Sections 10(a), (b), (d), (f), and (h), Texas
7-12     Environmental, Health, and Safety Audit Privilege Act (Article
7-13     4447cc, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), are amended to read as
7-14     follows:
7-15           (a)  Except as provided by this section, a person who makes a
7-16     voluntary disclosure of a violation of an environmental or health
7-17     and safety law is immune from an administrative or[,] civil[, or
7-18     criminal] penalty for the violation disclosed.
7-19           (b)  A disclosure is voluntary only if:
7-20                 (1)  the disclosure was made promptly after knowledge
7-21     of the information disclosed is obtained by the person;
7-22                 (2)  the disclosure was made in writing by certified
7-23     mail to an agency that has regulatory authority with regard to the
7-24     violation disclosed;
7-25                 (3)  an investigation of the violation was not
7-26     initiated or the violation was not independently detected by an
7-27     agency with enforcement jurisdiction before the disclosure was made
 8-1     using certified mail;
 8-2                 (4)  the disclosure arises out of a voluntary
 8-3     environmental or health and safety audit;
 8-4                 (5)  the person who makes the disclosure initiates an
 8-5     appropriate effort to achieve compliance, pursues that effort with
 8-6     due diligence, and corrects the noncompliance within a reasonable
 8-7     time;
 8-8                 (6)  the person making the disclosure cooperates with
 8-9     the appropriate agency in connection with an investigation of the
8-10     issues identified in the disclosure; and
8-11                 (7)  the violation did not result in injury or imminent
8-12     and substantial risk of serious injury to one or more persons at
8-13     the site or [substantial] off-site substantial actual harm or
8-14     imminent and substantial risk of harm to persons, property, or the
8-15     environment.
8-16           (d)  The immunity established by Subsection (a)  of this
8-17     section does not apply and an administrative or [,] civil[, or
8-18     criminal] penalty may be imposed under applicable law if:
8-19                 (1)  the person who made the disclosure intentionally
8-20     or knowingly committed or was responsible within the meaning of
8-21     Section 7.02, Penal Code, for the commission of the disclosed
8-22     violation;
8-23                 (2)  the person who made the disclosure recklessly
8-24     committed or was responsible within the meaning of Section 7.02,
8-25     Penal Code, for the commission of the disclosed violation and the
8-26     violation resulted in substantial injury to one or more persons at
8-27     the site or off-site harm to persons, property, or the environment;
 9-1                 (3)  the offense was committed intentionally or
 9-2     knowingly by a member of the person's management or an agent of the
 9-3     person and the person's policies or lack of prevention systems
 9-4     contributed materially to the occurrence of the violation; [or]
 9-5                 (4)  the offense was committed recklessly by a member
 9-6     of the person's management or an agent of the person, the person's
 9-7     policies or lack of prevention systems contributed materially to
 9-8     the occurrence of the violation, and the violation resulted in
 9-9     substantial injury to one or more persons at the site or off-site
9-10     harm to persons, property, or the environment; or
9-11                 (5)  the violation has resulted in a substantial
9-12     economic benefit which gives the violator a clear advantage over
9-13     its business competitors.
9-14           (f)  In a civil or[,] administrative[, or criminal]
9-15     enforcement action brought against a person for a violation for
9-16     which the person claims to have made a voluntary disclosure, the
9-17     person claiming the immunity has the burden of establishing a prima
9-18     facie case that the disclosure was voluntary.  After the person
9-19     claiming the immunity establishes a prima facie case of voluntary
9-20     disclosure, other than a case in which under Subsection (d) of this
9-21     section immunity does not apply, the enforcement authority has the
9-22     burden of rebutting the presumption by a preponderance of the
9-23     evidence or, in a criminal case, by proof beyond a reasonable
9-24     doubt.
9-25           (h)  The immunity under this section does not apply if a
9-26     court or administrative law judge finds that the person claiming
9-27     the immunity has, after the effective date of this Act, (1)
 10-1    repeatedly or continuously committed significant [serious]
 10-2    violations, and (2) not attempted to bring the facility or
 10-3    operation into compliance, so as to constitute a pattern of
 10-4    disregard of environmental or health and safety laws.  In order to
 10-5    be considered a "pattern," the person must have committed a series
 10-6    of violations that were due to separate and distinct events within
 10-7    a three-year period at the same facility or operation.
 10-8          SECTION 8.  This Act takes effect September 1, 1997, and
 10-9    applies only to an environmental or health and safety audit
10-10    prepared on or after that date.
10-11          SECTION 9.  The importance of this legislation and the
10-12    crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
10-13    emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
10-14    constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
10-15    days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.