AN ACT 1-1 relating to performance evaluation of tenured faculty at certain 1-2 institutions of higher education. 1-3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-4 SECTION 1. Subchapter Z, Chapter 51, Education Code, is 1-5 amended by adding Section 51.942 to read as follows: 1-6 Sec. 51.942. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY. 1-7 (a) In this section: 1-8 (1) "Governing board" has the meaning assigned by 1-9 Section 61.003. 1-10 (2) "Institution of higher education" means a general 1-11 academic teaching institution, medical and dental unit, or other 1-12 agency of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 1-13 61.003. 1-14 (3) "Neglect of duty" means continuing or repeated 1-15 substantial neglect of professional responsibilities. 1-16 (b) Each governing board of an institution of higher 1-17 education shall adopt rules and procedures providing for a periodic 1-18 performance evaluation process for all faculty tenured at the 1-19 institution. The governing board may design its rules and 1-20 procedures to fit the institution's particular educational mission, 1-21 traditions, resources, and circumstances relevant to its character, 1-22 role, and scope, in addition to other relevant factors determined 1-23 by the governing board in the rules adopted pursuant to this 2-1 section. The governing board shall seek advice and comment from 2-2 the faculty of the institution before adopting any rules pursuant 2-3 to this section. The advice and comment from the faculty on the 2-4 performance evaluation of tenured faculty shall be given the utmost 2-5 consideration by the governing board. 2-6 (c) In addition to any other provisions adopted by the 2-7 governing board, the rules shall include provisions providing that: 2-8 (1) each faculty member tenured at the institution be 2-9 subject to a comprehensive performance evaluation process conducted 2-10 no more often than once every year, but no less often than once 2-11 every six years, after the date the faculty member was granted 2-12 tenure or received an academic promotion at the institution; 2-13 (2) the evaluation be based on the professional 2-14 responsibilities of the faculty member, in teaching, research, 2-15 service, patient care, and administration, and include peer review 2-16 of the faculty member; 2-17 (3) the process be directed toward the professional 2-18 development of the faculty member; 2-19 (4) the process incorporate commonly recognized 2-20 academic due process rights, including notice of the manner and 2-21 scope of the evaluation, the opportunity to provide documentation 2-22 during the evaluation process, and, before a faculty member may be 2-23 subject to disciplinary action on the basis of an evaluation 2-24 conducted pursuant to this section, notice of specific charges and 2-25 an opportunity for hearing on those charges; and 3-1 (5) a faculty member be subject to revocation of 3-2 tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if incompetency, 3-3 neglect of duty, or other good cause is determined to be present. 3-4 (d) A faculty member subject to termination on the basis of 3-5 an evaluation conducted pursuant to this section must be given the 3-6 opportunity for referral of the matter to a nonbinding alternative 3-7 dispute resolution process as described in Chapter 154, Civil 3-8 Practice and Remedies Code. If both parties agree, another type of 3-9 alternative dispute resolution method may be elected. The 3-10 governing board must give specific reasons in writing for any 3-11 decision to terminate a faculty member on the basis of an 3-12 evaluation conducted pursuant to this section. 3-13 (e) A governing board may not waive the evaluation process 3-14 for any faculty member granted tenure at an institution. 3-15 (f) A governing board may not award tenure to an 3-16 administrator in any way that varies from the institution's general 3-17 policy on the award of tenure. 3-18 (g) Each governing board shall file a copy of the rules 3-19 adopted pursuant to this section, and any amendments to such rules, 3-20 with the coordinating board on or before September 1 of each year. 3-21 SECTION 2. The rules adopted by a governing board of an 3-22 institution of higher education pursuant to the provisions of this 3-23 Act shall provide for the performance evaluation of tenured faculty 3-24 not later than January 1, 2004, of each faculty member tenured at 3-25 the institution as of the effective date of this Act. S.B. No. 149 4-1 SECTION 3. This Act takes effect January 1, 1998. 4-2 SECTION 4. The importance of this legislation and the 4-3 crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an 4-4 emergency and an imperative public necessity that the 4-5 constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several 4-6 days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended. ________________________________ ________________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House I hereby certify that S.B. No. 149 passed the Senate on February 25, 1997, by a viva-voce vote; May 29, 1997, Senate refused to concur in House amendments and requested appointment of Conference Committee; May 30, 1997, House granted request of the Senate; May 31, 1997, Senate adopted Conference Committee Report by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 0. _______________________________ Secretary of the Senate I hereby certify that S.B. No. 149 passed the House, with amendments, on May 27, 1997, by a non-record vote; May 30, 1997, House granted request of the Senate for appointment of Conference Committee; May 31, 1997, House adopted Conference Committee Report by a non-record vote. _______________________________ Chief Clerk of the House Approved: ________________________________ Date ________________________________ Governor