LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  May 9, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney            IN RE:  House Bill No. 255, As Passed 2nd House
          Speaker of the House                Denny
          House of Representatives
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB255 ( Relating 
to permitting certain law enforcement authorities and probation 
officers to receive reduced airline fares while engaged in certain 
official duties.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB255-As Passed 2nd House
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
impact of $0 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium 
ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would allow a county sheriff, deputy sheriff, or juvenile 
probation officer who is transporting a state prisoner to participate 
in the General Services Commission's (GSC) contracts for travel 
services so that these officials, and their prisoners, can receive 
reduced airline fares.  The GSC would charge counties a fee 
for travel services received under this bill.
 
Methodolgy
 
Estimates are based on the commission's determination that extending 
travel contract eligibility to county sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, 
probation officers and their prisoners would significantly increase 
the agency's travel management workload.  Counties would be 
charged a fee by the commission to recover the agency's costs. 
 
The GSC notes that use of the state's discounted airline 
fares by county officials may lead to fare increases under the 
state's travel contracts.  This is based on the assumption that 
higher demand for discounted airfares would lead airlines to 
reduce the discount offered under state travel contracts in 
an attempt to recover lost revenue.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable Revenue   
            Savings/(Cost)     Gain/(Loss) from                                                           
            from Other -       Other -                                                                    
            Interagency        Interagency                                                                
            Contracts          Contracts                                                                  
            OTHER-OTH          OTHER-OTH                                                                   
       1998         ($50,964)           $50,964                                                      
       1998          (37,964)            37,964                                                      
       2000          (37,964)            37,964                                                      
       2001          (37,964)            37,964                                                      
       2002          (37,964)            37,964                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 

 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998                   $0
               1999                    0
               2000                    0
               2001                    0
               2002                    0
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
The GSC notes that use of the state's discounted airline fares 
by county officials would result in a potential savings of $8,750 
per county or $750,000 statewide, minus fees paid to the GSC 
for administrative expenses.  Actual savings would vary depending 
on each county's airline travel volume.  County administrative 
costs associated with processing travel accounts may reduce 
these savings.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   303   General Services Commission
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,RN