LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  February 27, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Allen Hightower, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 818
          Committee on Corrections                              By: Cuellar
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB818 ( Relating 
to the elimination of dual supervision of certain persons by 
the pardons and paroles division of the Texas Department of 
Criminal Justice and community supervision and corrections) 
this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB818-As Introduced
         

Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a 
net positive impact of $2,586,000 to General Revenue Related 
Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require 
community supervision and corrections departments to perform 
all supervision duties related to persons who are supervised 
by the pardons and paroles division of the Texas Department 
of Criminal Justice and then subsequently placed on community 
supervision by a court.  The bill would require the pardons 
and paroles division to resume supervision of persons whose 
community supervision term is completed, unless the period of 
supervision on parole or mandatory supervision has also been 
completed or the person is ordered confined due to revocation 
processes.    
 
Methodolgy
 
It is estimated 4,000 of the total parolee population also serves 
under community supervision. Taking into consideration the ratio 
of parole officers to parolees is required to be maintained 
at 1 to 75, the number of needed parole officers would be reduced 
as a result of the bill's passage.  This would generate savings 
in parole officer salaries and benefits.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first  five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:



 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                                   
            from General       Employees from                                                             
            Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998        $1,074,000            (46.0)                                                      
       1998         1,512,000            (48.0)                                                      
       2000         1,562,000            (50.0)                                                      
       2001         1,575,000            (50.0)                                                      
       2002         1,579,000            (50.0)                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $1,074,000
               1999            1,512,000
               2000            1,562,000
               2001            1,575,000
               2002            1,579,000
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government 
is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                         405   Department of Public Safety
                                         696   Department of Criminal Justice
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,CB ,JN