LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
March 10, 1997
TO: Honorable Irma Rangel, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1043
Committee on Higher Education By: Bailey
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1043 ( Relating
to the issuance of bonds under the Higher Education Authority
Act.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1043-As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Local Government
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend
the Higher Education Authority Act, which permits the creation
of education authorities to finance the construction of educational
facilities. The bill would add a definition to Section 53.02,
Education Code, for an accredited primary or secondary school.
The definition would encompass both public and private schools
that are accredited by the Texas Education Agency or a private
accrediting body.
Section 2 of the bill would expand the
sources of revenue which can be pledged to make bond payments
on debt issued by the authority.
Section 3 would expand
the entities for which an authority can finance and construct
facilities to include all accredited primary or secondary schools.
Current law limits the use of an authority for this purpose
to only certain counties, and only for certain military related
schools.
Contracting for facilities through a higher education
authority will not require voter approval, although a public
notification period is required.
This legislation would
take effect immediately if sufficient votes are received.
Methodology
The impact of this bill would be in the possible
access by school districts to new educational facilities constructed
by a higher education authority. However, it is presumed that
districts would be required to make lease payments for those
educational facilities at a level comparable to the cost of
debt needed to finance the projects.
The bill would allow
school districts to lease facilities constructed and financed
by an authority. Since an authority can be created by any incorporated
city or town, and because the facilities need not be within
the incorporated limits of the city, virtually any school district
would potentially be eligible to participate through an authority
created for this purpose.
Depending on the market conditions
which affect debt service, most school districts would pay higher
lease payments for a revenue bond financed project than if the
district issued traditional debt for the same project. It would
therefore likely be more costly to school districts to rent
facilities from an authority than construct the same facilities
financed by school district debt.
Source: Agencies: 701 Texas Education Agency - Administration
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
352 Bond Review Board
LBB Staff: JK ,LP ,DH