LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 11, 1997 TO: Honorable Warren Chisum, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1131, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted Committee on Environmental Regulation By: Puente House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1131 ( Relating to the creation by the attorney general of an environmental hotline.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1131-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative impact of $(1,196,766) to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend Chapter 402, Subchapter B of the Government Code and would require the attorney general to establish, publish, and maintain a toll-free environmental hotline to receive information on violations and suspected violations of environmental laws. The bill would also require the attorney general to compensate individuals 10 percent of assessed fines or civil or administrative penalty amounts (but not more than $1,000) for reporting information that substantially contributes to the assessment of a criminal, civil or administrative penalty for the violation of an environmental law. The bill would create a special account in the General Revenue Fund to be used to maintain the toll-free hotline, to investigate violations, and to make payments to persons eligible to receive compensation for reporting environmental violations. The account would consist of no more than 10 percent of the fines or civil or administrative penalties ordered or agreed to by the alleged violators and collected by the state in a fiscal year. The bill would take effect September 1, 1997. Methodolgy The Office of the Attorney General estimates that any additional costs resulting from the implementation of this bill could be absorbed within the current staff and resources. The Comptroller of Public Accounts does not anticipate any internal administrative costs associated with the bill. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) estimates that implementation of the bill would result in the following based on fiscal year 1996 activities: -- an annual loss to the General Revenue Fund of approximately $598,000 (10% of collected penalties); -- an increase in General Revenue costs of $299,000 each year (payments to individuals); -- an annual revenue gain of $598,000 to the special account (10% of collected penalties); and -- additional costs range from $269,000 to $300,000 each year due to a projected increase in the number of complaint investigations. This estimate assumes a loss to the General Revenue Fund based on 10 percent of penalties being deposited to the new special account. It also assumes that the maximum 10 percent of annual assessed and collected fines and penalties will be reallocated to the credit of the new account, and that costs associated with the payments to eligible individuals and for investigations will be paid from that account. No estimate of increased penalty revenue is included. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Probable Revenue Probable Change in Number Gain/(Loss) from Gain/(Loss) from Savings/(Cost) of State General Revenue New - GR Dedicated from New - GR Employees from Fund Dedicated FY 1997 0001 NEW-DED NEW-DED 1998 ($598,383) $598,383 ($595,322) 4.0 1998 (598,383) 598,383 (568,322) 4.0 2000 (598,383) 598,383 (568,322) 4.0 2001 (598,383) 598,383 (568,322) 4.0 2002 (598,383) 598,383 (568,322) 4.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($598,383) 1999 (598,383) 2000 (598,383) 2001 (598,383) 2002 (598,383) Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General 582 Natural Resources Conservation Commission 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK ,BB ,MS