LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 22, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Kenny Marchant, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 1188, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
          Committee on Financial Institutions                              By: Danburg/et al.
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1188 ( Relating 
to a voluntary, consensual encumbrance on homestead property 
for the purpose of an equity loan.) this office has detemined 
the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1188-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $428,000 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999, contingent upon 
the passage of a constitutional amendment allowing home equity 
lending.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
Upon passage of a constitutional amendment providing for home 
equity lending, this bill would create a division within the 
Office of the Consumer Credit Commissioner for the purpose of 
licensing, examining and verifying compliance of lenders with 
the provisions of the bill.  The Office of the Consumer Credit 
Commissioner projects that additional examiners will be required 
to examine an increased number of licensed lenders at an increased 
cost per examination as a result of the added complexity of 
the type of examinations conducted.  Collected revenues would 
increase due to the licensure of more regulated lenders, and 
from fees collected as a result of charges assessed to lenders 
for examinations. 

The bill would also direct the Consumer 
Credit Commissioner to establish and maintain an equity loan 
recovery fund.  Money in the fund would be used for reimbursing 
aggrieved persons who suffer actual damages.  Money received 
by the consumer credit commissioner for deposit in the equity 
loan recovery fund would be held by the consumer credit commissioner 
in trust for carrying out the purposes of the fund. The finance 
commission would be required to establish and collect reasonable 
and necessary fees from each authorized lender for each home 
equity loan originated by the lender to accomplish the purposes 
of the fund.  Fees collected shall be held in trust by the Consumer 
Credit Commissioner. 
 
Methodolgy
 
The Office of the Consumer Credit Commissioner's projected revenues 
of $1.3 million during the first year of implementation include 
increased licensing fees resulting from a projected increase 
in the number of lenders, as well as revenues generated from 
examinations.  The agency will charge a $150 surcharge per visit, 
plus $32 per hour of examination. 

The agency projects that 
the cost of the new division would include 22 additional FTEs, 
including 5 examiners, 2 assistant examiners, 3 financial analysts, 
2 attorneys, 1 consumer education specialist, and 9 administrative 
technicians.  Salaries are projected at $740,000 per year.  
With additional travel and related operating costs, the total 
costs of operation and staffing is estimated at slightly over 
$1 million dollars per year.  

Collection of funds for the 
equity loan recovery fund depends on rules established by the 
Finance Commission.  No amounts for this fund can be projected 
until such rules are promulgated. 

The Comptroller notes 
that, even though bill specifies that the Equity Loan Recovery 
Fund would be held in trust by the Office of Consumer Credit 
Commissioner, these funds could potentially be considered a 
new dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund. This fiscal 
note assumes that the Equity Loan Recovery Fund would not be 
a new dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund.


The probable fiscal implications of Implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable Revenue   Probable Revenue   Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Gain/(Loss) from   Gain/(Loss) from   of State                             
            from General       General Revenue    Other Funds -      Employees from                       
            Revenue Fund       Fund               Equity Loan        FY 1997                              
                                                  Recovery Fund                                           
            0001               0001               8042                                                     
       1998      ($1,077,000)        $1,256,000          $110,000              22.0                  
       1998       (1,012,000)         1,261,000           110,000              22.0                  
       2000       (1,023,000)         1,261,000           110,000              22.0                  
       2001       (1,043,000)         1,261,000           110,000              22.0                  
       2002       (1,090,000)         1,316,000           110,000              22.0                  
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998             $179,000
               1999              249,000
               2000              238,000
               2001              218,000
               2002              226,000
 
Similar annual fiscal implications These impacts would continue 
as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   TH ,JA